Re: [Python-Dev] (Licensing question) backport of shutil.copyfile() functionality

2019-03-11 Thread Terry Reedy
On 3/11/2019 10:54 PM, Inada Naoki wrote: Hello, some time ago I contributed a couple of patches to speedup shutil.copy*() functions: https://bugs.python.org/issue33671 https://bugs.python.org/issue33695 You retain copyright on the code you contributed. I would like to backport both

Re: [Python-Dev] (Licensing question) backport of shutil.copyfile() functionality

2019-03-11 Thread Inada Naoki
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:38 AM Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: > > Hello, > some time ago I contributed a couple of patches to speedup shutil.copy*() > functions: > https://bugs.python.org/issue33671 > https://bugs.python.org/issue33695 > I would like to backport both functionalities so that they can

Re: [Python-Dev] (Licensing question) backport of shutil.copyfile() functionality

2019-03-11 Thread Gregory P. Smith
Things in the standard library are already covered by the PSF license so that is what should be kept on backports from the stdlib to earlier versions. I do recommend keeping your backported stuff and new functionality separate (separate packages ideally, but that'll depend on how intertwined

Re: [Python-Dev] (Licensing question) backport of shutil.copyfile() functionality

2019-03-11 Thread Glenn Linderman
On 3/11/2019 4:35 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: Hello, some time ago I contributed a couple of patches to speedup shutil.copy*() functions: https://bugs.python.org/issue33671 https://bugs.python.org/issue33695 I would like to backport both functionalities so that they can be used on Python 2.7

[Python-Dev] (Licensing question) backport of shutil.copyfile() functionality

2019-03-11 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Hello, some time ago I contributed a couple of patches to speedup shutil.copy*() functions: https://bugs.python.org/issue33671 https://bugs.python.org/issue33695 I would like to backport both functionalities so that they can be used on Python 2.7 and <3.8 and put it on PYPI. In order to do so I

Re: [Python-Dev] Register-based VM [Was: Possible performance regression]

2019-03-11 Thread David Mertz
Parrot got rather further along than rattlesnake as a register based VM. I don't think it every really beat CPython in speed though. http://parrot.org/ On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, 5:57 PM Neil Schemenauer wrote: > On 2019-02-27, Victor Stinner wrote: > > The compiler begins with using static single

Re: [Python-Dev] Register-based VM [Was: Possible performance regression]

2019-03-11 Thread Neil Schemenauer
On 2019-02-27, Victor Stinner wrote: > The compiler begins with using static single assignment form (SSA) but > then uses a register allocator to reduce the number of used registers. > Usually, at the end you have less than 5 registers for a whole > function. In case anyone is interested on

Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Last-minute request: please backport bpo-33329 fix to 3.4 and 3.5

2019-03-11 Thread Victor Stinner
I don't think that a thread about a release is the right place to discuss a bug. Please open an issue at bugs.python.org  Victor Le lundi 11 mars 2019, Joni Orponen a écrit : > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:50 AM Larry Hastings wrote: >> >> On 3/4/19 2:29 AM, Joni Orponen wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar

Re: [Python-Dev] [bpo-35155] Requesting a review

2019-03-11 Thread Denton Liu
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:40:56PM -0800, Denton Liu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 02:14:55AM -0800, Denton Liu wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > A couple months back, I reported bpo-35155[1] and I submitted a PR for > > consideration[2]. After a couple of reviews, it seems like progress has > >

[Python-Dev] Initial updates to PEP 1 for Steering Council based governance

2019-03-11 Thread Nick Coghlan
Hi folks, Brett recently posted about the update to PEP 1 that added the PEP Sponsor role, but folks may not have noticed that we've also made the amendments needed to allow the PEP decision making process to restart: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/896/files This is the smallest change to

Re: [Python-Dev] Last-minute request: please backport bpo-33329 fix to 3.4 and 3.5

2019-03-11 Thread Joni Orponen
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:50 AM Larry Hastings wrote: > On 3/4/19 2:29 AM, Joni Orponen wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 7:08 AM Larry Hastings wrote: > >> This bug in bpo-33329: >> >> https://bugs.python.org/issue33329 >> >> >> This is also potentially affecting PGO builds of 2.7 on Debian