Re: [Python-Dev] Unicode identifiers in test files?

2019-05-03 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 10:46:03PM -0400, Eric V. Smith wrote: > Is there a policy against using Unicode identifiers in test files? [...] > I could work around this with exec-ing some strings, but that seems like > added confusion that I'd avoid with a real Unicode identifier. "Look, that's why

Re: [Python-Dev] Unicode identifiers in test files?

2019-05-03 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:46 PM Eric V. Smith wrote: > Is there a policy against using Unicode identifiers in test files? > > As part of adding !d to f-strings, there's a code path that's only > executed if the text of the expression is non-ascii. The easiest way to > exercise it, and the way I

[Python-Dev] Unicode identifiers in test files?

2019-05-03 Thread Eric V. Smith
Is there a policy against using Unicode identifiers in test files? As part of adding !d to f-strings, there's a code path that's only executed if the text of the expression is non-ascii. The easiest way to exercise it, and the way I found a bug, is by using an identifier with Unicode chars. I

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 574 ready for review

2019-05-03 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Wed, 1 May 2019 12:49:24 -0700 Nick Coghlan wrote: > Thanks Antoine. > > As BDFL-Delegate I'm happy with this version of the PEP, so it's my > pleasure to accept it for inclusion in Python 3.8. Thank you Nick! The implementation has been posted for review at

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

2019-05-03 Thread Python tracker
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2019-04-26 - 2019-05-03) Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open7081 ( -2) closed 41454 (+52) total 48535 (+50) Open issues

Re: [Python-Dev] Location of CI for Windows Embeddable Distro

2019-05-03 Thread Gerald Wiltse
Now that I have it working, I recall that the runtime challenge for a portable/embeddable distro on Linux is in the system configuration handling. This has always been a complicated fundamental behavior which has prevented or complicated many "portability" cases in the past. There are many

Re: [Python-Dev] Location of CI for Windows Embeddable Distro

2019-05-03 Thread Gerald Wiltse
I have it working on linux now. Is now a good time to open a ticket on Issue Tracker? Gerald R. Wiltse jerrywil...@gmail.com On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:55 AM Gerald Wiltse wrote: > Ok, disregard previous message. I fixed the PYTHONPATH in my command > and the .pyc files and . I also saw

Re: [Python-Dev] Location of CI for Windows Embeddable Distro

2019-05-03 Thread Gerald Wiltse
Ok, disregard previous message. I fixed the PYTHONPATH in my command and the .pyc files and . I also saw that python36._pth is specifically only supported by windows. Now i'm moved on to the following error: zipimport.ZipImportError: can't decompress data; zlib not available I'm on Ubuntu.

Re: [Python-Dev] Please merge : bpo-34848

2019-05-03 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2019-05-03 14:24, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi Srinivas, I merged your obvious doc fix, thanks. Can you please do the same for https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12784 ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

[Python-Dev] PEP 580/590 proposals summary

2019-05-03 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Hello all, If we want to have a chance of implementing PEP 580/590 in Python 3.8, we shouldn't wait too long to make a decision on which proposal to accept. As a summary, below I'll write the four proposals together with a star "score" for 3 criteria (there is no obvious best proposal, all

Re: [Python-Dev] Please merge : bpo-34848

2019-05-03 Thread Brett Cannon
The "awaiting merge" was originally created to help with this. On Fri., May 3, 2019, 08:51 Miro Hrončok, wrote: > On 03. 05. 19 14:24, Victor Stinner wrote: > > Does someone know how I can list pull requests which has been approved > but not > > merged yet? > > Add review:approved to the search

Re: [Python-Dev] Please merge : bpo-34848

2019-05-03 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 03. 05. 19 14:24, Victor Stinner wrote: Does someone know how I can list pull requests which has been approved but not merged yet? Add review:approved to the search filed. https://github.com/python/cpython/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+review%3Aapproved Or click on **Reviews** in the top bar

Re: [Python-Dev] Please merge : bpo-34848

2019-05-03 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi Srinivas, I merged your obvious doc fix, thanks. Does someone know how I can list pull requests which has been approved but not merged yet? Victor Le vendredi 3 mai 2019, Srinivas Reddy Thatiparthy < thatiparthysreeni...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, >The PR -

Re: [Python-Dev] Please merge : bpo-34848

2019-05-03 Thread Srinivas Reddy Thatiparthy
Yes, I agree. Please do as I do not have permission. Best Regards, Srinivas Reddy Thatipathy On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 16:52, Steve Holden wrote: > Looks like the failure is due to absence of a News entry. Maybe add a > "skip news" label if this doesn't need to be documented? > > Kind regards.

Re: [Python-Dev] Please merge : bpo-34848

2019-05-03 Thread Steve Holden
Looks like the failure is due to absence of a News entry. Maybe add a "skip news" label if this doesn't need to be documented? Kind regards. Steve Holden On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 9:48 AM Srinivas Reddy Thatiparthy < thatiparthysreeni...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, >The PR -

[Python-Dev] Please merge : bpo-34848

2019-05-03 Thread Srinivas Reddy Thatiparthy
Hi, The PR - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/9877 has been approved by Raymond long ago. Please merge or comment if not mergeable. Best Regards, Srinivas Reddy Thatipathy 7768044110. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org