Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2019-07-17 02:34, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > I prefer removal for ease of maintenance (people
> > always want to update code even if it's deprecated), and to help make sure
> > people who
> > don't read the docs but discover something via the REPL or something and
> >
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:07 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2019-07-16 15:33, Inada Naoki wrote:
> >> We currently have a deprecation policy saying that functions deprecated
> >> in version N cannot be removed before version N+2. That's a reasonable
> >> policy but some deprecation purists
PEP 8 would concur, whatever the current preferred style was. Under "Naming
Conventions":
"""New modules and packages (including third party frameworks) should be
written to these standards, but where an existing library has a different
style, internal consistency is preferred."""
The
