Hello,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 08:56:02 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > After much deliberation, the Python Steering Council is happy to
> > announce that we have chosen to accept PEP 634, and its companion
> > PEPs 635 and 636, collectively known as the Pattern Matching PEPs.
> > We acknowledge that P
Hi everywhere.
I decided to figure out why it is impossible to change methods of built-in
types and found
```
if (!(type->tp_flags & Py_TPFLAGS_HEAPTYPE)) {
PyErr_Format(
PyExc_TypeError,
"can't set attributes of built-in/extension type '%s'",
type-
Hello,
I submitted https://bugs.python.org/issue42819 a little over a month ago with
an accompanying PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24108.
Would it be possible to get feedback on it? This addresses a bug that occurs
when Python is compiled with the most recent release of GNU Readlin
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 6:21 am Python Steering Council, <
steering-coun...@python.org> wrote:
> After much deliberation, the Python Steering Council is happy to announce
> that we have chosen to accept PEP 634, and its companion PEPs 635 and 636,
> collectively known as the Pattern Matching PEPs. We
On 2/8/2021 3:12 PM, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
You want to make a poll or something?
Discourse can do that:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-to-create-polls/77548
On 08.02.2021 23:07, Barry Scott wrote:
I raise https://bugs.python.org/issue43156 that suggests that
new users on windo
On 2/7/2021 1:55 PM, Andrea Giudiceandrea via Python-Dev wrote:
Hi Python Dev team,
I submitted a PR https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23736 two months ago.
The PR, which fixes an issue https://bugs.python.org/issue41928 in ZipFile, is
"awaiting core review".
I nosied and requested a rev
On 2/8/21 12:07 PM, Python Steering Council wrote:
After much deliberation, the Python Steering Council is happy to announce that
we have chosen to accept PEP 634, and its companion PEPs 635 and 636,
collectively known as the Pattern Matching PEPs.
Yay! Congratulations Guido, Brandt, Tobias
After much deliberation, the Python Steering Council is happy to announce that
we have chosen to accept PEP 634, and its companion PEPs 635 and 636,
collectively known as the Pattern Matching PEPs. We acknowledge that Pattern
Matching is an extensive change to Python and that reaching consensus
You want to make a poll or something?
Discourse can do that: https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-to-create-polls/77548
On 08.02.2021 23:07, Barry Scott wrote:
I raise https://bugs.python.org/issue43156 that suggests that
new users on windows would be less confused if the name of the
installation p
I raise https://bugs.python.org/issue43156 that suggests that
new users on windows would be less confused if the name of the
installation program did not seem to imply it was the python program.
In a nutshell the proposal is to change from this:
python-3.10.0a5.exe
python-3.10.0a5-amd64.exe
Hi Mark,
On 04.02.21 12:47, Mark Shannon wrote:
Hi Sven,
On 04/02/2021 9:06 am, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
As long as it is possible to **write** to existing keys to **add new
keys** to frame.f_locals, I am actually quite happy.
Out of interest, why would you want to add new keys to the locals of
Hello,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 07:26:27 -0800
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This was intentional in PEP 572 so it is not a grammar bug fix.
>
> Put your money where your mouth is, or become another armchair
> language designer. Your choice.
Thanks for encouragement ;-). Adding "const" on the language l
This was intentional in PEP 572 so it is not a grammar bug fix.
Put your money where your mouth is, or become another armchair language
designer. Your choice.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 23:58 Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:10:55 -0800
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Hi P
Hello,
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:10:55 -0800
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I suggest that you just go straight to the PEP phase.
Thanks. In all fairness, I don't expect immediate resolution to this
issue. But I'm aware of out for at least a year, and keep returning to
it (yes, in context
14 matches
Mail list logo
