mingw-w64 might be a small change.
But while one is it at, it might make sense to evaluate:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/MSVCCompatibility.html
Apparently clang on Windows is working on calling convention compatibility
with Visual Studio.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 8:37 PM wrote:
> I think perhaps
I think perhaps we should admit that this build system is no longer supported.
From everything I can tell, the mingw project is no longer maintained. The
project's site, mingw.org, is no longer live; the project on sourceforge,
although still downloaded daily, had its last commit almost 3 years
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 23:24 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
> ... Releases are not just a push of a button.
On 2021-02-19 15:05, Stestagg wrote:
> > The thing that stood out from this conversation, for me, is: Releases
> > are too hard, and there’s a risk of not having enough volunteers as a
Looking at the other replies, I'm wondering if you fully understand python's
variant of version numbering.
I suggest we change the announcement template from:
"Python 3.9.2 is the newest major release of the Python programming language,
and it contains many new features and optimizations."
It's short notice, but PyCascades is hosting sprints on Sunday, Feb. 21
from 09:00 - 12:30 PST tomorrow and the organizers wanted to see if anyone
happened to be up for leading or helping out anyone who wants to sprint on
CPython.
https://2021.pycascades.com/program/sprints/
__
On 2/19/21 11:55 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
The PSF needs needs sufficient money to hire a couple of people, so the
PSF can turn release management and security maintenance from unpaid
volunteers into paid fulltime jobs.
Oh, is that all? Sustainability of the PSF, as has been shown ov
Hi Oscar
Quoting Oscar Benjamin :
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 15:41, Tobias Kohn wrote: [...]
It's not easy now to look back over the history of all of this. My
recollection of the original version of PEP 622 (if that's the right
one...) was that it had an overcomplicated protocol for __match__.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:44 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> I feel that vulnerability fixes do not make it to end users fast enough.
I think that it's time to put that into perspective with past vulnerabilities.
Ok, let me look at the timeline of the discussed vulnerability, ctypes
CVE-2021-3177:
http
On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 17:03 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 2/19/2021 5:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 23:24 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> > > Releases are not just a push of a button. Make the release
> > > job too onerous, and there might not be any more volunteers.
> >
>
