Please see https://lwn.net/Articles/847960/
:)
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 2:34 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 3/25/21 1:06 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> >
> > I posted this to LWN, and thought I'd share it here too:
>
> This post is nearly completely devoid of context -- could you post a link,
> or
Hi,
OpenSSL released 1.1.1k today with two high severity CVEs,
https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
The ssl module is not affected by CVE-2021-3450 in its default
configuration. Python does not set X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT on
SSLContext. Only applications that that use
Glad to help! Thank you Guido, Antoine, Serhiy, and Victor for your insights
and scrutinising :)
E
On 25 Mar 2021, at 18:15, Guido van Rossum
mailto:gu...@python.org>> wrote:
I’m glad there is more clarity here. And thanks to Erlend Egeberg Aasland for
championing the PR!
—Guido
On Thu,
On 3/25/21 1:06 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
I posted this to LWN, and thought I'd share it here too:
This post is nearly completely devoid of context -- could you post a link, or
what you are responding to, or something?
--
~Ethan~
___
Python-Dev
I posted this to LWN, and thought I'd share it here too:
I'm opposed to terse-ifying lambda in Python.
Lambda is rarely useful in Python - you're almost always better off using a
generator expression, a list comprehension, or something from the operator
module.
And lambdas tend to give rise to
Hi Victor,
I'm with you 100% on not returning borrowed references, doing so is just
plain dangerous.
However, is a blanket ban on stealing references the right thing?
Maybe the problem is the term "stealing".
The caller is transferring the reference to the callee.
In some circumstances it
On 25/03/2021 18.39, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:22:55 +0300
> Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
>> On 24.03.2021 19:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:45:49 +0300
>>> Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
How does C++ fare in binary compatibility? Last
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:22:55 +0300
Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> On 24.03.2021 19:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:45:49 +0300
> > Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> >> How does C++ fare in binary compatibility? Last time I checked it out
> >> (about 10 years
On 24.03.2021 19:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:45:49 +0300
Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
How does C++ fare in binary compatibility? Last time I checked it out (about 10
years ago), there was completely none, every compiler's ABI
was a black box without any guarantees
I’m glad there is more clarity here. And thanks to Erlend Egeberg Aasland
for championing the PR!
—Guido
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:30 Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new Include/README.rst file was just added to document the 3 C API
> provided by CPython:
>
> * Include/: Limited C API
> *
Hi,
A new Include/README.rst file was just added to document the 3 C API
provided by CPython:
* Include/: Limited C API
* Include/cpython/: CPython implementation details
* Include/internal/: The internal API
I would like to note that *new* public C API functions must no longer
steal references
Maybe we can change the discussion to something more productive like the
python module system or anything else?
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 21:39, Python Steering Council
wrote:
> This isn’t just about ‘master’ being rooted in slavery.
No it's not and I am shocked that such ignorance would exist to believe that.
--
Kind regards,
Stefano Borini
___
Python-Dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
