I also haven't the faintest idea what might be intended by the phrase "I
pretend your immediate excuses".
But whatever the intention, it is clear Marco has veered off into angry
ranting territory. Him taking a couple weeks away from this list would be
an extremely good idea.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021,
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 03:15, Tim Peters wrote:
> You think Steven was indirectly accusing you of unethical behavior
> (trolling for StackOverflow upvotes)?. That's not the sense I got from
> his original reply, but I can understand it if you did. If that's your
> complaint, I'll leave it to Steve
[Marco Sulla ]
> I repeat, even the worst AI will understand from the context what I
> meant.
Amazingly enough, the truth value of a proposition does not increase
via repetition ;-)
>>> bool(True * 1_000_000_000)
True
>>> bool(False * 1_000_000_000)
False
> But let me do a very rude example:
> W
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 4:56 AM Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> 13.08.21 20:24, Guido van Rossum пише:
> > If these weren't part of the stable ABI, I'd choose (E). But because
> > they are, I think only (A) or (B) are our options. The problem with (C)
> > is that if there's code that links to them but
On 2021-08-15 22:50, Marco Sulla wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:33, Tim Peters
wrote:ople have said now, including me, they had no idea what
you meant.by "I pretend your immediate excuses". It's not a complaint
that it's expressed inelegantly, but that they can't make _any_ sense
of it. By my
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 7:56 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:33, Tim Peters
> wrote:ople have said now, including me, they had no idea what
> > you meant.by "I pretend your immediate excuses". It's not a complaint
> > that it's expressed inelegantly, but that they can't make _
I make an example: what if I said to you that you want, with your
response, only endear Tim? Is it for you sarcastic or a subtle
insinuation?
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:58, Irit Katriel wrote:
> The reality, Marco, is that this list is for discussions about python
> development, not for seeking help with understanding python.
> It is not appropriate to "ask for help" on this list, and you are not
> entitled to a reply within X working
This is the source of this whole misunderstanding:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 9:34 PM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> I asked for help, because I didn't know __nothing__ about what Monica
> replied to me in the SO answer. And you say to me my post seems spam?
>
> [snipped]
> And you continue to mark my p
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:33, Tim Peters
wrote:ople have said now, including me, they had no idea what
> you meant.by "I pretend your immediate excuses". It's not a complaint
> that it's expressed inelegantly, but that they can't make _any_ sense
> of it. By my count, this is at least the second t
[Marco Sulla ]
> It's the Netiquette, Chris. It's older than Internet. It's a gross
> violation of the Netiquette remarking grammatical or syntactical
> errors. I think that also the least advanced AI will understand what I
> meant.
As multiple people have said now, including me, they had no idea
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 23:12, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Marco Sulla ]
> > Oh, this is enough. The sense of the phrase was very clear and you all
> > have understood it.
>
> Sincerely, I have no idea what "I pretend your immediate excuses."
> means, in or out of context.
>
> > Remarking grammatical er
It's the Netiquette, Chris. It's older than Internet. It's a gross
violation of the Netiquette remarking grammatical or syntactical
errors. I think that also the least advanced AI will understand what I
meant.
I think anyway that now the sense of my request is __very clear__. I
ask the interventio
[Marco Sulla ]
> Oh, this is enough. The sense of the phrase was very clear and you all
> have understood it.
Sincerely, I have no idea what "I pretend your immediate excuses."
means, in or out of context.
> Remarking grammatical errors is a gross violation
> of the Netiquette. I ask __immediatel
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 6:36 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
> > As Chris implied, the second 'sentence' is not grammatical English
>
> Oh, this is enough. The sense of the phrase was very clear and you all
> have understood it. Remarking grammatical errors is a gross violation
> of the Netiquette. I ask __
Furthermore, I have 13k points of reputation on SO. They are also too
much for me. I don't need dirty tricks to raise them. So I __pretend__
excuses from Steven, if it is a man.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an e
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 21:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
I opened the bug https://bugs.python.org/issue44921 . Anyway, this
does not change the insinuation I got here.
> In any case, drop this tread, which started off wrongly.
This thread will be dropped when Steven will give me the excuses for
the una
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:17 AM Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
> > On 8/13/2021 1:24 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm actually not sure what use case you're talking about.
"source/code that hadn't actually changed and was just being re-compiled and
run". I've do
SUMMARY: If you, Marco, want to get dicts subclasses made faster and you
seriously think that they can be, open a proper issue on
bugs.python.org., as I describe in 3 below.
In any case, drop this tread, which started off wrongly.
August 6, in response to the weekly post,
Summary of Python tra
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:24 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 12:54, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Are you looking for upvotes on StackOverflow
>
> This is unacceptable. I pretend your immediate excuses.
>
? I don't understand this, what do you mean?
ChrisA
___
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 12:54, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Are you looking for upvotes on StackOverflow
This is unacceptable. I pretend your immediate excuses.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-l
21 matches
Mail list logo
