Hi, Pablo.
I just submitted the PEP 686 to the SC.
https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/118
In this PEP, I am proposing:
a. Small improvement for UTF-8 mode in Python 3.11
b. Make UTF-8 mode default in Python 3.13.
(a) is an important change for (b) so I included it in the PEP.
For whatever reason, the links for two PEPs wouldn't work, so here are
working ones:
* [PEP 646](https://peps.python.org/pep-0646/)
* [PEP 675](https://peps.python.org/pep-0675)
--
Finn (Mobile)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022, 4:31 AM Pablo Galindo Salgado
wrote:
> Br. do you feel that? That's
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 7:05 am Victor Stinner, wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 3:29 PM Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > The changes you've made have been excellent, and the existing 3
> categories (stable public ABI, stable public API, unstable internal API)
> cover the vast majority of cases.
> >
> > The
I will consider adding it, but I am not sure it qualifies as a "major
feature". I will think about it :)
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 13:38, Jeremiah Vivian
wrote:
> > Can you provide a bpo number, please?
> bpo-433030
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list --
> Can you provide a bpo number, please?
bpo-433030
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
> Among the new major new features and changes so far:
This section of major new features should've included the addition of atomic
groups/possessive matching into the `re` module. This is a boost in regex
matching performance when the pattern doesn't need any backtracking.
> This section of major new features should've included the addition of
atomic groups/possessive matching into the `re` module. This is a boost in
regex matching performance when the pattern doesn't need any backtracking.
Can you provide a bpo number, please?
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 13:15,
Hi everyone,
We have approximately one month until feature freeze and for 3.11.0b1 to be
released. I wanted to take this time to share some planning
and considerations with you. Please, read carefully these points as they
are important.
* 3.11.0b1 is scheduled for Friday, 2022-05-06, which is
On 4/5/2022 11:52 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:36 PM Steve Dower wrote:
I don't see any additional discussion on the bug, and the prevailing
opinion from actual users of this API is that it probably shouldn't
change,
From what I understood my change basically only
A small correction (is fixed in other announcement pages):
The Faster Cpython Project is already yielding some exciting results: this
> version of CPython 3.11 is *~ 19%* faster on the geometric mean of the
> performance benchmarks, compared to 3.10.0.
That is, is not 12% faster but 19% faster.
Br. do you feel that? That's the chill of *beta freeze* coming
closer. Meanwhile, your friendly CPython release team doesn’t
rest and we have prepared a shiny new release for you: Python 3.11.0a7.
Hi,
(I briefly commented also on the doc regarding this)
I’m probably misinterpreting the exact goals. I read “stable ABI for everyone”
and I’m thinking “what needs to happen to stay binary compatible and working
for a couple of decades at least”. If that were the goal, I think the ideas
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 4:13 PM Coyot Linden (Glenn Glazer) <
co...@lindenlab.com> wrote:
> I would like to point out another use case of triple quotes outside of
> docstrings. We do a lot of SQL here and so doing a parameterized query
> like:
>
> """SELECT foo
> FROM bar
> WHERE baz = %s"""
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
