How about another str-like type, a sequence of char-or-bytes? Could be
called strbytes or stringwithinvalidcharacters. It would support
whatever subset of str functionality makes sense / is easy to
implement plus a to_escaped_str() method (that does the escaping the
PEP talks about) for people who
Would that not be a security concern, if you can get Python to execute
arbitrary code just by setting an environment variable?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 19:34, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > Now that you put it that way, it occurs to me that CI environ
the path
for future non-type-annotations, which could be used regardless of whether the
code is type-annotated.
--
Adrian
On February 14, 2021 2:20:14 PM GMT+01:00, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 07:48:10PM -, Eric Traut wrote:
>
>> I think it's
ore general type could be chosen instead.
I don't have any objections against the other parts of the PEP.
Adrian Freund
On 3/27/21 2:37 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As the 3.10 beta is not so far away, I've cut down PEP 653 down to the
> minimum needed for
s slowed, adding a type
checker to the standard library might be useful, but in my opinion it would
currently do more harm than good.
Adrian Freund
On April 13, 2021 11:55:05 PM GMT+02:00, Luciano Ramalho
wrote:
>Hugh was unfortunate in presenting the problem, but I agree that we
>sho
ouldn't be backported to versions before the
typing syntax was relaxed, unless explicitly wrapped in a string, but I would
imagine that if we see a relaxed annotation syntax we might see new typing
syntax every now and then after that.
Adrian Freund
On April 18, 2021 6:49:59 PM GMT+02:00,
ame':
g(t[1])
You could statically type t as Union[Tuple[Literal['version'], int],
Tuple[Literal['name'], str]], but inferring a Protocol for this would be either
very hard or even impossible, especially with even more complex conditions.
Adrian Freund
On A
On April 22, 2021 3:15:27 PM GMT+02:00, Paul Moore wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 13:23, Adrian Freund wrote:
>>
>> According to PEP 484 all missing annotations in checked functions should be
>> handled as Any. Any is compatible with all types.
>
>Yep, that's
On 4/22/21 5:00 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 15:22, Adrian Freund wrote:
>> On April 22, 2021 3:15:27 PM GMT+02:00, Paul Moore
>> wrote:
>>> but that's *absolutely* as far as I'd want to go. Note in particular
>>> that I don't w
or if additional
patches and build arguments are needed though.
Adrian
On 9/15/21 19:06, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
I am trying to compile Python3.10rc2 on rather unusual platform
(termux on android). The
gcc version is listed below:
~ $ g++ -v
clang version 12.0.1
Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-andr
TERMUX_PKG_SUGGESTS="python-tkinter"
Finally just run "./build-package.sh -i -f python" and send
"output/python*.deb" to your phone, where you can install it using dpkg -i.
Adrian
On 9/16/21 14:27, Adrian Freund wrote:
As you are using termux it might be worth
ion seems natural to me, so I wrote an enumeration library
some time ago that uses a simple metaclass to achieve
"type(Season.spring) is Season":
https://github.com/sampsyo/beets/blob/master/beets/util/enumeration.py
The module has other warts but perhaps it ca
e
website soon. 3.9.10 was released approximately one day after the commit
was made.
Regards,
Adrian Freund
On 3/15/22 18:43, Prasad, PCRaghavendra wrote:
Hi Team,
Can someone please let us know the release date of Python 3.9.11 (
with libexpat 2.4.8 security issues fixed )
In the python.org
On 2011-02-25 17:12, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 01:50 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>
>>> I think I would have liked the strategy of the PEP better (i.e.
>>> create clones for feature branches, rather than putting all
>>>
On 2011-02-26 22:06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2011, at 02:05 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:08:47 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> $ cd py27 # now I want to synchronize
>>> $ hg pull -u ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython
>>>
>>> but I'm not going to remember that url e
On 2011-02-27 00:13, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
> Branch Management
> bookmarks
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/BookmarksExtension
Bookmarks will be in Mercurial core for Mercurial 1.8, which will be
released in a few days (March 1st). So, with 1.8 it's no longer needed
to enable this ext
On 2011-02-27 01:50, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2011, at 11:45 PM, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>
>> You'd have to take this up with Mercurial's BDFL Matt. He is a strong
>> advocate for teaching users to learn edit their .hg/hgrc files.
>
> Well, I guess it&#
On 2011-02-26 23:26, Greg Ewing wrote:
> From: Antoine Pitrou
>> - a "branch" usually means a "named branch": a set of changesets
>> bearing the same label (e.g. "default"); that label is freely chosen
>> by the committer at any point, and enforces no topological
>> characteristic
>
> There
On 2011-02-27 16:35, Scott Dial wrote:
> On 2/27/2011 10:18 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> Well, chances are TortoiseHG comes with an UI to apply patches
>> (TortoiseSVN had one), so the command-line instructions may be of
>> little use to them.
>
> I don't believe TortoiseHG has such a feature (or
On 2011-02-27 23:21, Neil Hodgson wrote:
> Adrian Buehlmann:
>
>> FWIW, we are very close to releasing TortoiseHg 2.0 (due March 1st),
>> which ported the current Gtk based TortoiseHg to Qt (although, it was
>> more like a rewrite :-).
>
>I hope this is going to
On 2011-03-06 20:09, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> So, when I cloned, I should have done something like this:
>>>
>>> hg clone http://hg.python.org/cpython
>>> hg clone cpython 3.2
>>> hg clone 3.2 3.1
>>> hg clone cpython 2.7
>>> hg clone 2.7 2.6
>>> hg clone 2.6 2.5
>
On 2011-03-08 09:38, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> However, as Michael points out, you can have your tools generate the
>> patch. For example, it shouldn't be too hard to add a dynamic patch
>> generator to Roundup (although I haven't thought about the UI or the
>> CPU burden).
>
> For Mercurial, t
On 2011-03-08 10:53, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 09:38, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> However, as Michael points out, you can have your tools generate the
>>> patch. For example, it shouldn't be too hard to add a dynamic patch
>>> generator
On 2011-03-21 14:40, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:33:00 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
> wrote:
>> R. David Murray writes:
>> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:07:46 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
>> wrote:
>> > > No, at best the DVCS workflow forces the developer on a branch to
>> > >
On 2011-03-22 11:19, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 3/21/2011 9:19 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
>>
>>> Keeping the repository clean makes it easier to use a bisection search to
>>> hunt down the
This may seem like an odd question, but I’m intrigued by the idea of using
Python as a data definition language with “undo” support.
If I were to try and instrument the Python interpreter to be able to step
backwards, would that be an unduly difficult or inefficient thing to do?
(Please reply
to take a hash measurement of the .py file just before i open
it to run the script. is the above file the right place to call for the
measurement before the file open function?
thank you - adrian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http
rmission
denied error is not because of i'm unable to write on my 'measurereq' file,
but its because i'm unable to measure (read) the python file.
any clues? how can i go around this?
thanks - adrian
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
even speed up m68k.
> */
> #if !defined(__m68k__)
> (...)
>
> Such issue is hard to guess when you write code and usually only spot
> it while actually running the code on such architecture.
This is the only such place in the code where there is an extra section
for m68k
ing points.
I have already verified that these changes don't break on 32-bit PowerPC,
64-bit SPARC
and, of course, M68k.
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24624
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.o
30 matches
Mail list logo
