I am also for #2, as I don't think there is any concrete reason for making
**= special.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 5:05 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> If you read the language reference for augmented arithmetic assignment,
> you will note that it essentially says, "call __i__, and if that
> doesn't work
I think that if the other object is a string, trying to get a UUID
from it to compare UUIDs makes more sense than converting the UUID to
string and comparing strings. Several different strings are perfectly
fine for uniquely identifying the same UUID, so you seem to have
gotten this bit backward,
if it does not help with very small lists, we can
always put a threshold on the size and take this path or not.
--
Bernardo Sulzbach
http://www.mafagafogigante.org/
mafagafogiga...@mafagafogigante.org
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https
On 06/01/2016 09:44 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Everyone on the mypy team has a different opinion so the search is on. :-(
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Hai Nguyen wrote:
I am +1 for DistinctType (vs others) (no specific reason, just read out
loud).
At least on this
On 05/31/2016 08:58 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 31 May 2016 3:12 pm, "Glenn Linderman" wrote:
On 5/31/2016 12:55 PM, rndblnch wrote:
Guido van Rossum gmail.com> writes:
Also -- the most important thing. What to call these things? We're
pretty much settled on the
On 05/29/2016 10:53 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:19:05AM +, Artyom Skrobov wrote:
[...]
The motivation for this patch was to enable a memory footprint
optimization, discussed at http://bugs.python.org/issue26415 My
proposed optimization reduces the memory footprint
On 05/28/2016 12:19 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
Did anyone suggest "distinct type alias"?
I would just like to mention that "distinguished" seems to be more often
associated with notability and excellence than "distinct", which is
usually more neutral towards the quality of what it describes.
On 05/27/2016 07:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
If we demote them to second-class support (by making them only
> available in some builds, or using a slow pure Python implementation),
> then we'll be encouraging users to use inferior hashes. We shouldn't
> do this without a very good reason.
I
On 05/27/2016 11:31 AM, Daniel Holth wrote:
>
BLAKE2 is important, since it removes the last objection to replacing MD5 -
speed - that has made it hard for cryptography fans to convince MD5 users
to upgrade.
I have had to stick to MD5 for performance reasons (2 seconds in MD5 or
9.6 seconds
On 05/25/2016 04:37 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
Wouldn't downloading the Microsoft C++ Runtime 2015 also work? Many recent
computers already have it pre-installed.
Even though the download seems to be only 14 MB (I don't have a Windows
machine, so I cannot assure that just the file on MS website
On 05/20/2016 09:27 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
The period is a full-stop punctuation mark, but visually obscure [1].
It is small. This does not make it hard to notice, however. Not to
mention that it will usually be followed by a capitalized letter, which
further highlights it. Commas usually
On 05/20/2016 01:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Is there a specific reason for calling out two spaces in comments after a
period(I realize it's probably for consistency, but I sure don't ever think
about this when I write comment)? Otherwise who actually still writes using
two spaces after
12 matches
Mail list logo