[Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews
Hi, On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:19:12AM -0500, Éric Araujo wrote: Hi, Le 01/02/2022 à 07:25, Martin Dengler a écrit : The fact people are assuming bad faith and spilling ink about those getting involved with that extremely-underserved part when contributors are sorely > needed is counter-productive. I disagree, the original message was a good-faith question about how to interpret a pattern. It is healthy to check with the group to discuss if there is a problem and how to deal with it. I understand what you're saying; if we meet in person I'm happy to discuss further -- but as my original point was that long messages about small, probably-in-good-faith-but-could-be-in-bad-faith actions (as these turned out to be) are (further) wastes of time (net-net), I won't continue. [snip] Regards Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/66GTVP7HIGQ6WT52PCGAFPW2L3LZ22W7/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: Increase of Spammy PRs and PR reviews
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:35:02AM -0500, Terry Reedy wrote: On 1/31/2022 7:31 PM, Nikita Sobolev wrote: Hi, my name is Nikita and I think that I am the person behind these spammy PRs. Link: https://github.com/python/cpython/pulls/sobolevn I also encouraged multiple easily reviewable PRs from you. Please continue. Preening a large codebase is not only a good thing, but encourages familiarity: not only with the code, but with the opaque and worst-documentend parts of the software development processes: the maintenance lifecycle. The fact people are assuming bad faith and spilling ink about those getting involved with that extremely-underserved part when contributors are sorely needed is counter-productive. It would be better if more people contributed small changes and thus became low-friction contributors who don't require a lot of mentoring. Terry Jan Reedy Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/IK2GOZ3R67QGZJH2CQUVWHYQPUDEOU6B/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: Dropping out of this list
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:36:00PM -0400, Jonathan Goble wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:22 PM Terry Reedy wrote: On 8/18/2021 9:37 PM, Edwin Zimmerman wrote: > On 8/18/21 9:18 PM, Jonathan Goble wrote: >> I am mostly a lurker, but I am also considering unsubscribing if someone doesn't step in and stop the mess > > +1 Both the email and newsreader parts of Thunderbird have an option called Ignore Thread. Do your readers have such? I consume my email from a variety of disparate devices, including a Debian laptop, a Windows desktop, a Chromebook, an Android phone, and various university-managed computer labs. As such, and as I rely heavily on Gmail's filtering and labeling system to manage my email, I rely solely on Google's standard web interface and Android app for Gmail for the sake of a consistent experience across devices. I don't know if Google offers such an option. It takes me about three seconds to click a thread, see the arguing, and click Archive, but I'm getting tired of doing that repeatedly. https://gsuitetips.com/tips/gmail/how-to-mute-and-find-email-conversations/ To mute an email thread, simply: - Within Gmail: - Open the email conversation you want to mute - Click more and in the drop down menu select mute [...] When a conversation is muted, any new message will bypass your inbox so that the conversation stays archived. Muted conversations will reappear in your inbox if a new message in the conversation is addressed to you and no one else, or if you're added to the "To" or "Cc" line in a new message. Does that fix your problem? Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/HTKWGADUUAIPYSJVHCSQ6GKLPICM6Z56/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: Steering Council reply regarding conduct (was Re: Steering Council update for February)
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:02:38PM -0700, Python Steering Council wrote: From Thomas Wouters, on behalf of and with full support of the Python Steering Council: [use of SC power; specifically, PEP-0013.Powers.2: 'Enforce ... code of conduct'] From PEP 13[^1] To use its powers, the council votes. [...] Whenever possible, the council's deliberations and votes shall be held in public. Please share the deliberations and votes. Martin [^1]: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0013.rst ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/WWVV7ONKG7GD73JJ7YBPHTSRH2PCRY3U/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-ideas] Re: Amend PEP-8 to require clear, understandable comments instead of Strunk & White Standard English comments
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 05:51:04PM +0100, MRAB wrote: I'd also add: Try to avoid regionalisms; aim for a broadly "international" form of the language. Some How do you spell "regionalism"? Martin PS: Irony intended ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/3L7UEATIHJ4JV5UDXLMKRUMC3H2EXWLY/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [Python-Dev] Yet another "A better story for multi-core Python" comment
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:33:49PM -0400, Trent Nelson wrote: PyObjects, loads a huge NumPy array, and has a WSS of ~11GB. [...] I've done a couple of consultancy projects now that were very data science oriented (with huge data sets), so I really gained an appreciation for how common the situation you describe is. It is probably the best demonstration of PyParallel's strengths. This problem is also common in well-heeled financial services places, many of which are non-Windows. There might be some good opportunities there. Trent. Martin pgpEhY6ahMoN9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:56:53AM -0700, Larry Hastings wrote: > So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care > about GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? Or do you not care? Developer using python on windows here. I care, yes. It's valuable and significant to be able to authenticate the files on different platforms (your GnuPG advantage #1), and using the same tools. It's also useful to have a very mature tool to do that. And valuable that all files can be so validated, not just the .exes. > //arry/ Martin pgpOa9fc_5Nny.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
