On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 2:21 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote:
> Question: Should we retire and archive this mailing list ?
> (I'm asking as one of the maintainers of the ML)
+1 to retiring and archiving.
Less overhead for maintainers and information concentrated at a single
source, that is,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:23:59PM -0700, Lincoln Auster wrote:
> This is a follow-up RFC on PR #30520 (BPO 46337) with regard to urllib's
...
> It's been about a month since I wrote that PR, and it was marked stale a
> day or two ago. Would anyone be willing to give it a look for feedback
> and
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> I propose to deprecate the urllib module in Python 3.11. It would emit
> a DeprecationWarning which warn users, so users should consider better
> alternatives like urllib3 or httpx: well known modules, better
> maintained, more
Your configure script did pick up openssl as the support version was not
found.
What is your operating system? Make sure you have supported version of
ssl. Python requires openssl 1.1.1 or higher.
On Mac, I had to use brew to install it and --with-openssl flag.
On some linux machines, I have
Replying to Python-Dev. I hope you found the list and got feedback from
the documentation maintainers. Python devguide
https://devguide.python.org/ was using an updated theme, and I assume
that docs will get updated soon a responsive. There have been plenty
discussions on this front.
Thank you,
>
> As part of PEP 588, migrating bugs.python.org issues to Github, there
> are two current mailing list related items that need a replacement or
> need to be turned down.
>
> 1. Weekly summary emails with bug counts and issues from the week,
> example:
>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 04:27:19AM +, Chandrakant Shrimantrao wrote:
> Hi,
> We would like to know if there is any option available to execute and debug(
> setting break point and delete break point) C/C++ Source files Python API's
> inside Eclipse IDE after interfacing Pydev with Eclipse.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:57 AM Angus Hollands wrote:
> Should look more like
> ```python
> x = np.array(...)
> y = x[2 < x < 8]
> ```
> Is there any interest in pushing this PEP along?
>
My personal opinion is, it is worth discussing again. I could see the
benefits this brings to Numpy
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 02:28:08PM +, Jason R. Coombs wrote:
> If you run such a buildbot, please consider running this command on
> your repo to bypass the issue:
>
> git rm -r :/ ; git checkout HEAD -- :/
>
> You may want to consider adding this command after every update to the
> repo to
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 04:30:33AM +, Jay K wrote:
> Hi. I have an Alpha/OSF machine up and running.
> It is little slow, but it works ok.
>
> I would like to run Python3 on it.
>
> I have it "compiling and working". It was easy enough so far.
> https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27063
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Irit Katriel via Python-Dev wrote:
> The next step is to add deprecation warnings, so that we can eventually delete
> them. There is also the issue that some of the stdlib tests are still using
> these libraries, but this does not need to block removing
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 04:07:57PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I've got a comparison of sort algorithms in both Cython and Pure Python (your
> choice) at:
> https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/sort-comparison/
> ...including a version of timsort that is in Cython or Pure Python.
>
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 07:08:06PM +0100, Robin Becker wrote:
> The regression may well be a platform issue. I am by no means an expert at
> building python; I followed a recipe from the ARCH PKGBUILD of some time
I meant the change in the diff we were suspecting was supposed to be
"Windows"
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:10:53AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This is not a complete thought yet, but it occurred to me that while we have
> deprecated APIs (which will eventually go away), and provisional APIs (which
> must mature a little before they're declared stable), and stable APIs
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:55:57AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Maybe this?
>
> 04732ca993 bpo-43105: Importlib now resolves relative paths when creating
> module spec objects from file locations (GH-25121)
Likely!. But
On 3 Jun 2021, at 09:31, Robin Becker wrote:
> ReportLab has quite a large codebase and I think it would be hard to
> get a concise test of this behaviour change. I would be glad if this
> is an expected change a7-->b1 and if the use of '.' in this way has
> become somehow wrong.
To me, this
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:44:06PM +0100, Barney Gale wrote:
> From a bit of googling, Python seems to be an outlier in having a function to
> retrieve another user’s home directory.
> Any views on this? Is expanduser(‘~other’) fixable and worth fixing? If not,
> should we deprecate this
ded the .name property to bz2.Bzip2File and added a test to
> verify it. -- H
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 21:40, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>
>> There is an open bug report https://bugs.python.org/issue24258
>>
>> I guess it was overlooked. It could be a good task for som
There is an open bug report https://bugs.python.org/issue24258
I guess it was overlooked. It could be a good task for someone interested.
Please add me as a reviewer if you submit a patch, I can help review and
move it forward.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:22 PM wrote:
> I was surprised recently
Given this discussion, I am motivated to review this and merge this
into stdlib. The conversation was helpful to me to understand for
utility value of the method introduced by the patch.
I had stated in the PR as well.
Thank you, both, Faisal and Jakub.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:40 PM Jakub
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:36 AM Faisal Mahmood
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I hope you are all well, I currently have an issue / merge request that has
> become stale and as per the guidelines I am sending this e-mail to request
> someone to review it for me please.
>
> Issue Number: 42861
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 02:08:05PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> I have submitted a PR, GH-24118
> (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24118),
> on January 5.
>
> It's a relatively simple patch that fixes smtplib.SMTP logic for AUTH LOGIN,
> alongside a fix for the test for that class.
I've
Hello Anthony,
Welcome to this list. :) Python is written in C, and developers use
semicolons and branches in C. However, when Guido designed Python, he
specifically wanted white-space indented language. The idea was it
will be less intimidating to beginners and more readables.
It seems to have
Hello Nathan,
The PR is merged. Thank you for contributing and following up here.
--
Senthil
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:50:13PM +, Nathan Beals wrote:
> Good Afternoon Python Devs,
>
> I'm requesting that someone review the pull request linked to this issue:
>
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:05 AM Larry Hastings wrote:
> I guess we forgot to observe it yesterday, but: February 19, 1991, was the
> day Guido first posted Python 0.9.1 to alt.sources:
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sources/c/O2ZSq7DiOwM/m/gcJTvCA27lMJ
>
> Happy 30th birthday, Python!
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:58 PM Skip Montanaro
wrote:
>
> I then pushed the result to a Github repo:
>
> https://github.com/smontanaro/python-0.9.1
>
Wow. Was white-space not significant in this release of Python? I see the
lack of indentation in the first Python programs.
Hi Pablo,
Looks like alpha 5 was scheduled for today. I am willing to take care of
this issue - https://bugs.python.org/issue42967
The patch is reasonable, but the changes are backwards incompatible.
Since it is with an underlying parsing library, the decision here is tricky
one way or the
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:46:51PM +0300, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> There's a recurring error case when a 3rd-party module
> overrides a standard one if it happens to have the same name.
Any argument and expectation is off in this case. We shouldn't worry about such
scenarios.
--
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:22 PM Ned Deily wrote:
>
>
> In the meantime, another potential security issue has arisen that might
> impact 3.7 and 3.6 so I'm going to continue to hold off on the releases
> until we have a resolution of that.
>
> https://bugs.python.org/issue42967
>
>
And another
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:24:54AM +, Julien Palard via Python-Dev wrote:
> I think the best way to handle this is to make the three next releases
> (3.10, 3.11, 3.12) Sphinx 2 and Sphinx 3 compatible, this would gather
> requiered benefits:
>
> If this plan is OK for everyone, I'll try a
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 02:53:30AM +0300, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> > I support keeping same Sphinx version across all the supported python
> > versions.
>
> This is not a sustainable route since this way, there's no way to change the
> version at all.
>
By supported, I mean the
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:28:42AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> The alternative is to keep Sphinx 2 support, use
> strip_signature_backslash and don't use :no-trim-doctest-flags: ?
+1. :no-trim-doctest-flags: was introduced to python docs only recently, so not
using that is a reasonable
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 08:38:17PM +, Julien Palard via Python-Dev wrote:
> - Some functions declarations are lacking a backslash, like
>print(*objects, sep=' ', end='n', ...
>
> Which is bad.
Wouldn't this a bug with Sphinx?
Why would that be special cased with a flag
Hi Paul,
> Per PEP 525, I can call aclose coroutine method to cleanup the generator, but
> it requires the code iterating to be aware that that closing the generator is
> necessary.
How about treating this as a bug for the specific use case that you mentioned,
rather than a complete addition of
+1 vote on removal. No concerns. It's been deprecated for a long time now
(since 3.4).
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:54 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
> Since importing the module emits a DeprecationWarning at runtime since
> Python 3.4 and the deprecation is properly documented, IMO it's fine
> to
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:05 AM Thomas Wouters wrote:
>
> The primary reason I care about the integration with the rest of Python is
> because it limits the future expansion of the language.
>
I did not think as deeply as you have done on this subject here.
My exposure to pattern matching was
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:18 AM Christian Heimes
wrote:
>
>
> In my experience it would be useful to keep the bytes warning for
> implicit representation of bytes in string formatting. It's still a
> common source of issues in code.
>
I am with Christian here. Still notice a possibility of
Congratulations, Pablo!
Thank you for taking care of buildbots, and donning this new role.
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:54 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> In light of the release of Python 3.9b1, let’s take a moment to celebrate
> all the great work that our Python 3.8 and 3.9 release manager Łukasz
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:44 PM Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
> I share the same concerns:
1) the PEP contains several factual errors. I pointed this out during
> the core-sprints last year and more recently Berker pointed out some
> on GitHub: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/1013 ;
> 4) Berker
Hello Python Developers,
Google is running a program called Season of Docs (
https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/) to encourage technical
writers to improve the documentation of Open Source Projects.
As Python-Dev, and Python Software Foundation, do you think:
a) We should participate?
Congrats, Łukasz. And Thank you, Ned, for managing the 3.6 and 3.7
Releases.
--
Senthil
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> As Ned just announced, Python 3.7 is very soon to enter beta 1 and thus
> feature freeze. I think we can all give Ned a huge
Someone in HackerNews shared the Guido's Python 1.0.0 announcement from 27
Jan 1994. That is, on this day, 20 years ago.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.lang.misc/_QUzdEGFwCo/KIFdu0-Dv7sJ
It is very entertaining to read.
* Guido was the release manager, which is now taken
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Stéphane Wirtel gave a talk last month at Pycon CA about CPython pull
> requests. His slides:
>
>https://speakerdeck.com/matrixise/cpython-loves-your-pull-requests
>
> He produced interesting statistics that we
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>
> This update included ~300 changesets from upstream and required an
> additional ~30 to update our instances and our fork of Roundup. A number
> of features that we added to our fork over the years have been ported
> upstream and they have
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The cherry picker bot has just been deployed to CPython repo, codenamed
> miss-islington.
>
> miss-islington made the very first backport PR for CPython and became a
> first time GitHub contributor:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Recently, I wrote reports of my CPython contributions since 1 year
> 1/2. Some people on this list might be interested, so here is the
> list.
They are prolific!
Thanks for keeping a log and sharing.
--
Senthil
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> I know that different people have different expectation on GitHub. I
> would like to take the opportunity of migrating to Git to use the
> "author" and "committer" fields. If the author is set to the real
> author,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:27 PM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> I wonder if #python-dev is logged by BotBot.me.
>
> I'm sorry if it had rejected already.
I don't think so, but channel ops could request it.
Also, I found (https://www.irccloud.com) to be helpful to look at IRC
logs
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Yurij Alexandrovich
wrote:
>
> Cssdbpy is a simple SSDB client written on Cython. Faster standart SSDB
> client.
>
> https://github.com/deslum/cssdbpy
>
Congrats. You should post this in python-annouce@ list. This list
python-dev is about
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:17 PM, MRAB wrote:
> I think you shouldn't delete them. It would be better just to say that
> you've changed your mind and explain why.
>
I support this. Please leave your new comments correcting previous one and
support your current stance.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were
> always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux
> buildbots. There were a lot of different issues.
>
> So please try to
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> For example, rename utils.py to utils_noqa.py. A side
> effect is that you have to update all imports. For example, replace
> "import django" with "import django_noqa". After a study of the PSF,
> it's a best
> On Feb 27 2016, at 2:47 pm, Ian Lee ianlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Perhaps the better / easier solution is to promote the *real* “Sem-official
read-only mirror of the Python Mercurial repository” [1] ? And perhaps this
goes away entirely (in time) with PEP-512 [2]?
We will be working
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, francismb wrote:
> Pros, Cons, where could be applicable (new commits, new workflow, it
> doesn't make sense), ...
>
-1. formatting should be done by humans (with the help of tools) before
committing.
It should not be left to a robot to make
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Dima Tisnek dim...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugs.python.org/issue21238 introduces detection of
missing/misspelt mock.assert_xxx() calls on getattr level in Python
3.5
It was controversial when it got committed too. Discussions happened in
python-committers
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
Senthil,
There is now an active 3.5 branch, so the correct current order of
merging is:
3.4 - 3.5
3.5 - default
I've checked in a couple of null merges to try to fix things.
Oh! Missed that. Sorry, for the trouble.
I will update
for those folks. python-dev is
dedicated to development of python language itself.
Please ask python-us...@python.org
--
Senthil Kumaran
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe
This change is okay and not harmful. But I think, It might still not fix
the encoding issue that we encountered on Mac.
[localhost cpython]$ hg log -l 1
changeset: 92128:7cdc941d5180
tag: tip
parent: 92126:3153a400b739
parent: 92127:a894b629bbea
user:Serhiy Storchaka
:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e0510a3bdf8f
changeset: 92111:e0510a3bdf8f
branch: 2.7
parent: 92097:6d41f139709b
user:Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com
date:Sat Aug 16 14:16:14 2014 +0530
summary:
Fix Issue #8797: Raise HTTPError on failed Basic
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote:
Instead dealing 2.7 will just be completely optional for core
developers. (The much anticipated vendor support arrives at this point.)
Could you clarify your thoughts a bit on the completely optional part.
What if
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote:
I consider the security enhancement/feature question to be in the domain
of PEP 466. If security stuff lands in the 2.7 branch, it will get
released eventually is all I'm saying.
Thanks for the response.
Instead
Here are my notes that I jotted down from the back row. Forgive me for any
mistakes. (As I shared in the intro, I am trying to get back and keep up.
:))
Python Release Process:
* Larry Hastings goes for vote for shortend release process. But Guido
does not seem to be excited about it.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
You may want to tweak the tracker so the comment ends up on the
appropriate issue (#19092 is something else entirely)
Yes. This was supposed to be #19097. My bad.
___
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
I am not sure how widespread is this breaking of RFC, but it seems to me
that quite a lot (e.g., http://stackoverflow.com/a/9698319/164233 which
just en passant expects urllib2 authentication stuff to be useless), and
the
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
Patch contributed by Vajrasky Kok. Addresses Issue #17324
+trailing_slash = True if path.rstrip().endswith('/') else False
Wouldn't this be better just as:
trailing_slash = path.rstrip().endswith('/')
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:57:25 +0200 (CEST)
senthil.kumaran python-check...@python.org wrote:
+ local
Optional argument random is a 0-argument function returning a
random float in [0.0, 1.0); if it is
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote:
2013/6/25 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com:
And then I ran make distclean...
You've left us hanging...
Yeah, the final part is here: http://bz.selenic.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3954#c4
But still I have question
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
juncture 5 total years of maintenance is reasonable. This means there
will be approximately 4 more 2.7 releases.
That's good. From the subject of the email, I though you were
announcing This is the end of 2.7.x
Thanks Daniel, for all the patches and improving the test coverage.
Hope you had a good time and will you enjoy contributing further.
Happy touring SF.
--
Senthil
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:24 PM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
Thank you for your contributions, and we look
changeset: 82765:4f2080e9eee2
parent: 82763:4c6463b96a2c
user:Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com
date:Tue Mar 19 12:07:43 2013 -0700
summary:
../bug-fixes/http_error_interface/.hg/last-message.txt
files:
Lib/test/test_urllib2.py | 39
And this is not just with Python. Try any other dynamic language
(Ruby), send a function in place of a string and see failure msg. And
if the question is really about path joins and path manipulations,
then I believe PEP 428 ( http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0428/)
would be better candidate to
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is: would you accept to break backward compatibility (in
Python 3.4) to fix a potential security vulnerability?
If not, an alternative is to add an option, disabled by default, to
enable (or disable)
Yes, this is question is for python-li...@python.org
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Elli Lola lampenregensch...@web.de wrote:
$ ./python -m test -v test_urlwithfrag
Where did you get this command from? It looks to me to me that more than
one person is trying the exact same command
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.netwrote:
Chances are the problem won't be very annoying in practice, but just
FYI.
I dont get this. I see 2.7 as a separate un-merged branch again (
http://hg.python.org/cpython/graph). Just curious, what happened next?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org wrote:
+1 for 3.4
You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support
in the stdlib? It's the next step after HTTP 1.1.
Yeah, it is a good idea. it should live along side with HTTP 1.1 as
another
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
On 8/18/2012 11:47 AM, MRAB wrote:
I vote -0. The issue can also be addressed with a small and simple
helper function that wraps urlparse and compares the query parameter. Or
you cann urlencode() with
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org wrote:
Will there be more 2.7 bugfix releases, and when the next one?
In other words; if I submit a patch and it is accepted, can I
expect that patch be committed also to the 2.7 branch?
We are still back-porting bug fixes
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Please fix the markup: no blank line, but indented. E.g.
.. versionchanged:: 3.3
Blah, blah.
Done. Sorry for that, I only built the docs and saw if the directive
was affected and assumed it okay.
Fixed that.
Thanks,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Daily code coverage builds would be nice, but that's probably beyond
what the current infrastructure can offer. It would be nice if someone
wants to investigate that.
Code coverage buildbots would indeed be good. I
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'm not sure how useful it is to have a build slave which you can't
commit to having for more than 3 months. So I'm -0 on adding this
slave, but it is up to Antoine to decide.
I am likely switch to places within 3
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
What are the characteristics of your machine? We already have several
Linux x86/x86-64 buildbots... That said, we could also toy with other
build options if someone has a request about that.
It is not very unique. It
Hello,
I just got a Ubuntu Server running at my disposal, which could be
connected 24/7 for at least next 3 months. I am not sure how helpful
it would be to have another buildbot on Ubuntu, but i wanted to play
with it for a while (as I have more comfort with Ubuntu than any other
Unix flavor)
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37:25PM +0200, ezio.melotti wrote:
range of Unicode whitespace characters.
-\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equiv. to [^ \t\n\r\f\v].
+\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equivalent to [^\s].
Is this correct? While I
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into the stdlib?
Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in
3.2 and 3.3. I
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
issue2193 - Update docs about the legal characters allowed in Cookie name
You missed the dummy merge from 3.2 to indicate that this change had
been applied to both branches independently.
Yes. Sorry for that. I was being
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:33:30PM +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
+
+with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning) as cm:
req.add_data(data)
There's no need for adding the as cm if you don't need the cm object.
I overlooked. Thanks for spotting. I have corrected it.
--
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:16:54PM +0300, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
I tried to:
andrew@tiktaalik2 ~/projects hg clone ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython
ssh://h...@hg.python.org/sandbox/tkdocs
repo created, public URL is http://hg.python.org/sandbox/tkdocs
abort: clone from remote to
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:30:31PM -0700, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
When I build python from sources I have no lzma support (module _lzma
cannot be built).
I have liblzma-dev, liblzma2 and lzma packages installed on ubuntu. I
am able to build and import lzma module.
Thanks,
Senthil
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:48:04PM -0700, Andrey Petrov wrote:
@Senthil: I originally asked Guido for guidance on improving the
standard library and perhaps including some of my favourite projects,
but he pointed out that in a couple of years we might end up again in
the same position as
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 07:23:11PM -0700, Andrey Petrov wrote:
I've had the pleasure of speaking with Guido at PyCon and it became evident
that some of Python's included batteries are significantly lagging behind the
rapidly-evolving defacto standards of the community specifically in cases like
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:07 AM, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
supreme ruler sounds good to me. I could go for inquisitor instead
of czar as well...
But that would be bad for developers from Spain as nobody would expect
a spanish inquisition.
:-)
--
Senthil
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:05:41PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
That's great news, does that now mean the objects inventory for
Python 2.7 and Python 3 on python.org now supports referring to
section headers from 3rd party packages?
Nope. It does not seem to have any relation to that. Would
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:26:19PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
My original suggestion to Antoine and Georg for 3.4 was that we simply
propose to Larry Hastings (the 3.4 RM) that we spread out the release
cycle, releasing the first alpha after ~6 months, the second after
about ~12, then rolling
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
I've volunteered to be the Release Manager for Python 3.4. The FLUFL has
That's cool. But just my thought, wouldn't it be better for someone
who regularly commits, fixes bugs and feature requests be better for a
RM
No. I think, you are welcome to write something about the recent
changes you made to Python.
--
Senthil
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:40:06PM +0100, Jesús Cea wrote:
Python insider blog was a great idea, trying to open and expose python-dev to
the world. A great and necessary idea.
But the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:17:10AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
NEWS entry? (same question for the later _sre fix)
Added. Thanks for catching this.
For some reason, I had slight doubt, if those issues were NEWS worthy
items. IIRC, devguide recommends that a NEWS entry be added for all fixes
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Looks like your entry went into the Interpreter Core section instead of
Library.
That should be corrected.
BTW, I don’t understand “3.x version will come as a separate patch” in
I think, he meant in a separate commit.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:58:24PM +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote:
hg.python.org/cpython/2.7/path/to/file.py should work just fine.
The correct path seems to be:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/modulefile.py
IIRC the reason why we don't do it on 2.x is because we don't have
the
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:16:01PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
There are still a lot of spaces in your message. You should use string
Yes, did not realize that.. :( Georg fixed this in his commit.
Thanks,
Senthil
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:23:19PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
This is the same test repeated. Perhaps you meant svn+ssh?
oops, thanks for the catch. yes, I did mean svn+ssh. I shall change
it.
--
Senthil
___
Python-Dev mailing list
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo