[Python-Dev] Re: Retiring this mailing list ?

2023-11-14 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 2:21 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > Question: Should we retire and archive this mailing list ? > (I'm asking as one of the maintainers of the ML) +1 to retiring and archiving. Less overhead for maintainers and information concentrated at a single source, that is,

[Python-Dev] Re: urllib: addressing inflexibility in scheme-based joining

2022-02-10 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:23:59PM -0700, Lincoln Auster wrote: > This is a follow-up RFC on PR #30520 (BPO 46337) with regard to urllib's ... > It's been about a month since I wrote that PR, and it was marked stale a > day or two ago. Would anyone be willing to give it a look for feedback > and

[Python-Dev] Re: It's now time to deprecate the stdlib urllib module

2022-02-06 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote: > I propose to deprecate the urllib module in Python 3.11. It would emit > a DeprecationWarning which warn users, so users should consider better > alternatives like urllib3 or httpx: well known modules, better > maintained, more

[Python-Dev] Re: compiled python3.10 is unable to find _ssl

2021-10-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Your configure script did pick up openssl as the support version was not found. What is your operating system? Make sure you have supported version of ssl. Python requires openssl 1.1.1 or higher. On Mac, I had to use brew to install it and --with-openssl flag. On some linux machines, I have

[Python-Dev] Re: RFC: New/update the Docs Sphinx theme: responsive, edit page links,

2021-09-23 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Replying to Python-Dev. I hope you found the list and got feedback from the documentation maintainers. Python devguide https://devguide.python.org/ was using an updated theme, and I assume that docs will get updated soon a responsive. There have been plenty discussions on this front. Thank you,

[Python-Dev] Re: Is anyone relying on new-bugs-announce/python-bugs-list/bugs.python.org summaries

2021-09-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
> > As part of PEP 588, migrating bugs.python.org issues to Github, there > are two current mailing list related items that need a replacement or > need to be turned down. > > 1. Weekly summary emails with bug counts and issues from the week, > example: >

[Python-Dev] Re: API's to interface python with Eclipse to execute and debug C/C++ Source files.

2021-08-31 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 04:27:19AM +, Chandrakant Shrimantrao wrote: > Hi, > We would like to know if there is any option available to execute and debug( > setting break point and delete break point) C/C++ Source files Python API's > inside Eclipse IDE after interfacing Pydev with Eclipse.

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP-535 (Rich comparison chaining) Discussion?

2021-08-31 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:57 AM Angus Hollands wrote: > Should look more like > ```python > x = np.array(...) > y = x[2 < x < 8] > ``` > Is there any interest in pushing this PEP along? > My personal opinion is, it is worth discussing again. I could see the benefits this brings to Numpy

[Python-Dev] Re: Windows buildbots may be broken

2021-08-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 02:28:08PM +, Jason R. Coombs wrote: > If you run such a buildbot, please consider running this command on > your repo to bypass the issue: > > git rm -r :/ ; git checkout HEAD -- :/ > > You may want to consider adding this command after every update to the > repo to

[Python-Dev] Re: Python3 OSF/1 support?

2021-07-14 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 04:30:33AM +, Jay K wrote: > Hi. I have an Alpha/OSF machine up and running. > It is little slow, but it works ok. > > I would like to run Python3 on it. > > I have it "compiling and working". It was easy enough so far. > https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27063

[Python-Dev] Re: Towards removing asynchat, asyncore and smtpd from the stdlib

2021-06-23 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Irit Katriel via Python-Dev wrote: > The next step is to add deprecation warnings, so that we can eventually delete > them. There is also the issue that some of the stdlib tests are still using > these libraries, but this does not need to block removing

[Python-Dev] Re: Why list.sort() uses mergesort and not timsort?

2021-06-07 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 04:07:57PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote: > I've got a comparison of sort algorithms in both Cython and Pure Python (your > choice) at: > https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/sort-comparison/  > ...including a version of timsort that is in Cython or Pure Python. >

[Python-Dev] Re: change of behaviour for '.' in sys.path between 3.10.0a7 and 3.10.0b1

2021-06-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 07:08:06PM +0100, Robin Becker wrote: > The regression may well be a platform issue. I am by no means an expert at > building python; I followed a recipe from the ARCH PKGBUILD of some time I meant the change in the diff we were suspecting was supposed to be "Windows"

[Python-Dev] Re: Proposal: declare "unstable APIs"

2021-06-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:10:53AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > This is not a complete thought yet, but it occurred to me that while we have > deprecated APIs (which will eventually go away), and provisional APIs (which > must mature a little before they're declared stable), and stable APIs

[Python-Dev] Re: change of behaviour for '.' in sys.path between 3.10.0a7 and 3.10.0b1

2021-06-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:55:57AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Maybe this? > > 04732ca993 bpo-43105: Importlib now resolves relative paths when creating > module spec objects from file locations (GH-25121) Likely!. But

[Python-Dev] Re: change of behaviour for '.' in sys.path between 3.10.0a7 and 3.10.0b1

2021-06-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On 3 Jun 2021, at 09:31, Robin Becker wrote: > ReportLab has quite a large codebase and I think it would be hard to > get a concise test of this behaviour change. I would be glad if this > is an expected change a7-->b1 and if the use of '.' in this way has > become somehow wrong. To me, this

[Python-Dev] Re: expanduser('~other') reliability and future

2021-04-28 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:44:06PM +0100, Barney Gale wrote: > From a bit of googling, Python seems to be an outlier in having a function to > retrieve another user’s home directory. > Any views on this? Is expanduser(‘~other’) fixable and worth fixing? If not, > should we deprecate this

[Python-Dev] Re: bz2.BZ2File doesn't support name?

2021-04-27 Thread Senthil Kumaran
ded the .name property to bz2.Bzip2File and added a test to > verify it. -- H > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 21:40, Senthil Kumaran wrote: > >> There is an open bug report https://bugs.python.org/issue24258 >> >> I guess it was overlooked. It could be a good task for som

[Python-Dev] Re: bz2.BZ2File doesn't support name?

2021-04-26 Thread Senthil Kumaran
There is an open bug report https://bugs.python.org/issue24258 I guess it was overlooked. It could be a good task for someone interested. Please add me as a reviewer if you submit a patch, I can help review and move it forward. On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:22 PM wrote: > I was surprised recently

[Python-Dev] Re: Merge Request Review Reminder

2021-03-22 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Given this discussion, I am motivated to review this and merge this into stdlib. The conversation was helpful to me to understand for utility value of the method introduced by the patch. I had stated in the PR as well. Thank you, both, Faisal and Jakub. On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:40 PM Jakub

[Python-Dev] Re: Merge Request Review Reminder

2021-03-19 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:36 AM Faisal Mahmood wrote: > > Hello, > > I hope you are all well, I currently have an issue / merge request that has > become stale and as per the guidelines I am sending this e-mail to request > someone to review it for me please. > > Issue Number: 42861

[Python-Dev] Re: Requesting Review for GH-24118 (Fix for bpo-27820)

2021-03-09 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 02:08:05PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > I have submitted a PR, GH-24118 > (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24118), > on January 5. > > It's a relatively simple patch that fixes smtplib.SMTP logic for AUTH LOGIN, > alongside a fix for the test for that class. I've

[Python-Dev] Re: Suggestion About Python Syntax

2021-03-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hello Anthony, Welcome to this list. :) Python is written in C, and developers use semicolons and branches in C. However, when Guido designed Python, he specifically wanted white-space indented language. The idea was it will be less intimidating to beginners and more readables. It seems to have

[Python-Dev] Re: Requesting Review of Pull Request

2021-03-02 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hello Nathan, The PR is merged. Thank you for contributing and following up here. -- Senthil On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:50:13PM +, Nathan Beals wrote: > Good Afternoon Python Devs, > > I'm requesting that someone review the pull request linked to this issue: >

[Python-Dev] Re: Happy 30th Birthday, Python!

2021-02-21 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:05 AM Larry Hastings wrote: > I guess we forgot to observe it yesterday, but: February 19, 1991, was the > day Guido first posted Python 0.9.1 to alt.sources: > > https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sources/c/O2ZSq7DiOwM/m/gcJTvCA27lMJ > > Happy 30th birthday, Python!

[Python-Dev] Re: Python 0.9.1

2021-02-16 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:58 PM Skip Montanaro wrote: > > I then pushed the result to a Github repo: > > https://github.com/smontanaro/python-0.9.1 > Wow. Was white-space not significant in this release of Python? I see the lack of indentation in the first Python programs.

[Python-Dev] Re: [python-committers] [ Release ] Python 3.10a5 and release blockers

2021-02-01 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hi Pablo, Looks like alpha 5 was scheduled for today. I am willing to take care of this issue - https://bugs.python.org/issue42967 The patch is reasonable, but the changes are backwards incompatible. Since it is with an underlying parsing library, the decision here is tricky one way or the

[Python-Dev] Re: New sys.module_names attribute in Python 3.10: list of all stdlib modules

2021-01-25 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:46:51PM +0300, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote: > There's a recurring error case when a 3rd-party module > overrides a standard one if it happens to have the same name. Any argument and expectation is off in this case. We shouldn't worry about such scenarios. --

[Python-Dev] Re: Upcoming 3.7.10 and 3.6.13 Security Releases

2021-01-20 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:22 PM Ned Deily wrote: > > > In the meantime, another potential security issue has arisen that might > impact 3.7 and 3.6 so I'm going to continue to hold off on the releases > until we have a resolution of that. > > https://bugs.python.org/issue42967 > > And another

[Python-Dev] Re: Bumping minimum Sphinx version to 3.2 for cpython 3.10?

2021-01-15 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 08:24:54AM +, Julien Palard via Python-Dev wrote: > I think the best way to handle this is to make the three next releases > (3.10, 3.11, 3.12) Sphinx 2 and Sphinx 3 compatible, this would gather > requiered benefits: > > If this plan is OK for everyone, I'll try a

[Python-Dev] Re: Bumping minimum Sphinx version to 3.2 for cpython 3.10?

2021-01-12 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 02:53:30AM +0300, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote: > > I support keeping same Sphinx version across all the supported python > > versions. > > This is not a sustainable route since this way, there's no way to change the > version at all. > By supported, I mean the

[Python-Dev] Re: Bumping minimum Sphinx version to 3.2 for cpython 3.10?

2021-01-12 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:28:42AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote: > The alternative is to keep Sphinx 2 support, use > strip_signature_backslash and don't use :no-trim-doctest-flags: ? +1. :no-trim-doctest-flags: was introduced to python docs only recently, so not using that is a reasonable

[Python-Dev] Re: Bumping minimum Sphinx version to 3.2 for cpython 3.10?

2021-01-12 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 08:38:17PM +, Julien Palard via Python-Dev wrote: > - Some functions declarations are lacking a backslash, like >print(*objects, sep=' ', end='n', ... > > Which is bad. Wouldn't this a bug with Sphinx? Why would that be special cased with a flag

[Python-Dev] Re: Dusting off PEP 533?

2021-01-05 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hi Paul, > Per PEP 525, I can call aclose coroutine method to cleanup the generator, but > it requires the code iterating to be aware that that closing the generator is > necessary. How about treating this as a bug for the specific use case that you mentioned, rather than a complete addition of

[Python-Dev] Re: Remove formatter module

2020-11-24 Thread Senthil Kumaran
+1 vote on removal. No concerns. It's been deprecated for a long time now (since 3.4). On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:54 AM Victor Stinner wrote: > Since importing the module emits a DeprecationWarning at runtime since > Python 3.4 and the deprecation is properly documented, IMO it's fine > to

[Python-Dev] Re: My thoughts on Pattern Matching.

2020-11-06 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:05 AM Thomas Wouters wrote: > > The primary reason I care about the integration with the rest of Python is > because it limits the future expansion of the language. > I did not think as deeply as you have done on this subject here. My exposure to pattern matching was

[Python-Dev] Re: When to remove BytesWarning?

2020-10-26 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:18 AM Christian Heimes wrote: > > > In my experience it would be useful to keep the bytes warning for > implicit representation of bytes in string formatting. It's still a > common source of issues in code. > I am with Christian here. Still notice a possibility of

[Python-Dev] Re: [python-committers] Please welcome our next Release Manager, Pablo!

2020-05-19 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Congratulations, Pablo! Thank you for taking care of buildbots, and donning this new role. On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:54 PM Barry Warsaw wrote: > In light of the release of Python 3.9b1, let’s take a moment to celebrate > all the great work that our Python 3.8 and 3.9 release manager Łukasz

Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] PEP 581 (Using GitHub issues for CPython) is accepted

2019-05-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:44 PM Ezio Melotti wrote: > > I share the same concerns: 1) the PEP contains several factual errors. I pointed this out during > the core-sprints last year and more recently Berker pointed out some > on GitHub: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/1013 ; > 4) Berker

[Python-Dev] Season of Docs

2019-04-15 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hello Python Developers, Google is running a program called Season of Docs ( https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/) to encourage technical writers to improve the documentation of Open Source Projects. As Python-Dev, and Python Software Foundation, do you think: a) We should participate?

Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Welcome the 3.8 and 3.9 Release Manager - Łukasz Langa!

2018-01-27 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Congrats, Łukasz. And Thank you, Ned, for managing the 3.6 and 3.7 Releases. -- Senthil On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > As Ned just announced, Python 3.7 is very soon to enter beta 1 and thus > feature freeze. I think we can all give Ned a huge

[Python-Dev] Guido's Python 1.0.0 Announcement from 27 Jan 1994

2018-01-27 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Someone in HackerNews shared the Guido's Python 1.0.0 announcement from 27 Jan 1994. That is, on this day, 20 years ago. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.lang.misc/_QUzdEGFwCo/KIFdu0-Dv7sJ It is very entertaining to read. * Guido was the release manager, which is now taken

Re: [Python-Dev] "CPython loves your Pull Requests" talk by Stéphane Wirtel

2017-12-05 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Stéphane Wirtel gave a talk last month at Pycon CA about CPython pull > requests. His slides: > >https://speakerdeck.com/matrixise/cpython-loves-your-pull-requests > > He produced interesting statistics that we

Re: [Python-Dev] bugs.python.org updated

2017-09-27 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote: > > This update included ~300 changesets from upstream and required an > additional ~30 to update our instances and our fork of Roundup. A number > of features that we added to our fork over the years have been ported > upstream and they have

Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Cherry picker bot deployed in CPython repo

2017-09-07 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote: > Hi, > > The cherry picker bot has just been deployed to CPython repo, codenamed > miss-islington. > > miss-islington made the very first backport PR for CPython and became a > first time GitHub contributor:

Re: [Python-Dev] Reports on my CPython contributions

2017-03-05 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Recently, I wrote reports of my CPython contributions since 1 year > 1/2. Some people on this list might be interested, so here is the > list. They are prolific! Thanks for keeping a log and sharing. -- Senthil

Re: [Python-Dev] GitHub migration scheduled for Friday

2017-02-07 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > I know that different people have different expectation on GitHub. I > would like to take the opportunity of migrating to Git to use the > "author" and "committer" fields. If the author is set to the real > author,

Re: [Python-Dev] IRC logs via BotBot.me

2017-01-04 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:27 PM, INADA Naoki wrote: > I wonder if #python-dev is logged by BotBot.me. > > I'm sorry if it had rejected already. I don't think so, but channel ops could request it. Also, I found (https://www.irccloud.com) to be helpful to look at IRC logs

Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Cssdbpy is a simple SSDB client written on Cython. Faster standart SSDB client.

2016-09-13 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Yurij Alexandrovich wrote: > > Cssdbpy is a simple SSDB client written on Cython. Faster standart SSDB > client. > > https://github.com/deslum/cssdbpy > Congrats. You should post this in python-annouce@ list. This list python-dev is about

Re: [Python-Dev] Tracker Etiquette

2016-05-07 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:17 PM, MRAB wrote: > I think you shouldn't delete them. It would be better just to say that > you've changed your mind and explain why. > I support this. Please leave your new comments correcting previous one and support your current stance.

Re: [Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!

2016-04-14 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Last months, most 3.x buildbots failed randomly. Some of them were > always failing. I spent some time to fix almost all Windows and Linux > buildbots. There were a lot of different issues. > > So please try to

Re: [Python-Dev] The next major Python version will be Python 8

2016-03-31 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > For example, rename utils.py to utils_noqa.py. A side > effect is that you have to update all imports. For example, replace > "import django" with "import django_noqa". After a study of the PSF, > it's a best

Re: [Python-Dev] Very old git mirror under github user "python-git"

2016-02-27 Thread Senthil Kumaran
> On Feb 27 2016, at 2:47 pm, Ian Lee ianlee1...@gmail.com wrote: > > Perhaps the better / easier solution is to promote the *real* “Sem-official read-only mirror of the Python Mercurial repository” [1] ? And perhaps this goes away entirely (in time) with PEP-512 [2]? We will be working

Re: [Python-Dev] Code formatter bot

2016-01-19 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, francismb wrote: > Pros, Cons, where could be applicable (new commits, new workflow, it > doesn't make sense), ... > -1. formatting should be done by humans (with the help of tools) before committing. It should not be left to a robot to make

Re: [Python-Dev] How far to go with user-friendliness

2015-07-14 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Dima Tisnek dim...@gmail.com wrote: https://bugs.python.org/issue21238 introduces detection of missing/misspelt mock.assert_xxx() calls on getattr level in Python 3.5 It was controversial when it got committed too. Discussions happened in python-committers

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython (merge 3.4 - default): null merge with 3.4

2015-06-15 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Ned Deily wrote: Senthil, There is now an active 3.5 branch, so the correct current order of merging is: 3.4 - 3.5 3.5 - default I've checked in a couple of null merges to try to fix things. Oh! Missed that. Sorry, for the trouble. I will update

Re: [Python-Dev] Help with finding tutors for Python, Linux, R, Perl, Octave, MATLAB and/or Cytoscape for yeast microarray analysis, next generation sequencing and constructing gene interaction networ

2015-01-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
for those folks. python-dev is dedicated to development of python language itself. Please ask python-us...@python.org -- Senthil Kumaran ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.4 - default): Issue #22165: Fixed test_undecodable_filename on non-UTF-8 locales.

2014-08-17 Thread Senthil Kumaran
This change is okay and not harmful. But I think, It might still not fix the encoding issue that we encountered on Mac. [localhost cpython]$ hg log -l 1 changeset: 92128:7cdc941d5180 tag: tip parent: 92126:3153a400b739 parent: 92127:a894b629bbea user:Serhiy Storchaka

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Fix Issue #8797: Raise HTTPError on failed Basic Authentication immediately.

2014-08-16 Thread Senthil Kumaran
: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e0510a3bdf8f changeset: 92111:e0510a3bdf8f branch: 2.7 parent: 92097:6d41f139709b user:Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com date:Sat Aug 16 14:16:14 2014 +0530 summary: Fix Issue #8797: Raise HTTPError on failed Basic

Re: [Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7

2014-04-09 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote: Instead dealing 2.7 will just be completely optional for core developers. (The much anticipated vendor support arrives at this point.) Could you clarify your thoughts a bit on the completely optional part. What if

Re: [Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7

2014-04-09 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote: I consider the security enhancement/feature question to be in the domain of PEP 466. If security stuff lands in the 2.7 branch, it will get released eventually is all I'm saying. Thanks for the response. Instead

Re: [Python-Dev] Language Summit notes

2014-04-09 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Here are my notes that I jotted down from the back row. Forgive me for any mistakes. (As I shared in the intro, I am trying to get back and keep up. :)) Python Release Process: * Larry Hastings goes for vote for shortend release process. But Guido does not seem to be excited about it.

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (3.3): Issue #19092 - Raise a correct exception when cgi.FieldStorage is given an

2014-01-12 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: You may want to tweak the tracker so the comment ends up on the appropriate issue (#19092 is something else entirely) Yes. This was supposed to be #19097. My bad. ___

Re: [Python-Dev] urllib2.HTTPBasicAuthHandler doesn't work with GitHub API

2013-11-04 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: I am not sure how widespread is this breaking of RFC, but it seems to me that quite a lot (e.g., http://stackoverflow.com/a/9698319/164233 which just en passant expects urllib2 authentication stuff to be useless), and the

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.3 - default): Fix http.server's request handling case on trailing '/'.

2013-09-29 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote: Patch contributed by Vajrasky Kok. Addresses Issue #17324 +trailing_slash = True if path.rstrip().endswith('/') else False Wouldn't this be better just as: trailing_slash = path.rstrip().endswith('/')

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython (merge 3.3 - default): merge from 3.3

2013-09-29 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:57:25 +0200 (CEST) senthil.kumaran python-check...@python.org wrote: + local Optional argument random is a 0-argument function returning a random float in [0.0, 1.0); if it is

Re: [Python-Dev] End of the mystery @README.txt Mercurial bug

2013-06-25 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote: 2013/6/25 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com: And then I ran make distclean... You've left us hanging... Yeah, the final part is here: http://bz.selenic.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3954#c4 But still I have question

Re: [Python-Dev] The end of 2.7

2013-04-06 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote: juncture 5 total years of maintenance is reasonable. This means there will be approximately 4 more 2.7 releases. That's good. From the subject of the email, I though you were announcing This is the end of 2.7.x

Re: [Python-Dev] PyCon Sprints - Thank you

2013-03-20 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Thanks Daniel, for all the patches and improving the test coverage. Hope you had a good time and will you enjoy contributing further. Happy touring SF. -- Senthil On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:24 PM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote: Thank you for your contributions, and we look

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: ../bug-fixes/http_error_interface/.hg/last-message.txt

2013-03-19 Thread Senthil Kumaran
changeset: 82765:4f2080e9eee2 parent: 82763:4c6463b96a2c user:Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com date:Tue Mar 19 12:07:43 2013 -0700 summary: ../bug-fixes/http_error_interface/.hg/last-message.txt files: Lib/test/test_urllib2.py | 39

Re: [Python-Dev] os.path.join failure mode

2013-02-09 Thread Senthil Kumaran
And this is not just with Python. Try any other dynamic language (Ruby), send a function in place of a string and see failure msg. And if the question is really about path joins and path manipulations, then I believe PEP 428 ( http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0428/) would be better candidate to

Re: [Python-Dev] Set close-on-exec flag by default in SocketServer

2013-01-09 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote: My question is: would you accept to break backward compatibility (in Python 3.4) to fix a potential security vulnerability? If not, an alternative is to add an option, disabled by default, to enable (or disable)

Re: [Python-Dev] test failed: test_urlwithfrag

2013-01-04 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Yes, this is question is for python-li...@python.org On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Elli Lola lampenregensch...@web.de wrote: $ ./python -m test -v test_urlwithfrag Where did you get this command from? It looks to me to me that more than one person is trying the exact same command

Re: [Python-Dev] Branch ancestry hiccup on the Mercurial repo

2013-01-01 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.netwrote: Chances are the problem won't be very annoying in practice, but just FYI. I dont get this. I see 2.7 as a separate un-merged branch again ( http://hg.python.org/cpython/graph). Just curious, what happened next?

Re: [Python-Dev] Better HTTP 1.1 support in http.server?

2012-09-24 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org wrote: +1 for 3.4 You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support in the stdlib? It's the next step after HTTP 1.1. Yeah, it is a good idea. it should live along side with HTTP 1.1 as another

Re: [Python-Dev] Should urlencode() sort the query parameters (if they come from a dict)?

2012-08-19 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote: On 8/18/2012 11:47 AM, MRAB wrote: I vote -0. The issue can also be addressed with a small and simple helper function that wraps urlparse and compares the query parameter. Or you cann urlencode() with

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7 releases

2012-07-26 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org wrote: Will there be more 2.7 bugfix releases, and when the next one? In other words; if I submit a patch and it is accepted, can I expect that patch be committed also to the 2.7 branch? We are still back-porting bug fixes

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: Fix 5931 - Python runtime hardcoded in wsgiref.simple_server - Now it specifies

2012-07-08 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote: Please fix the markup: no blank line, but indented. E.g. .. versionchanged:: 3.3 Blah, blah. Done. Sorry for that, I only built the docs and saw if the directive was affected and assumed it okay. Fixed that. Thanks,

Re: [Python-Dev] Another buildslave - Ubuntu again

2012-05-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: Daily code coverage builds would be nice, but that's probably beyond what the current infrastructure can offer. It would be nice if someone wants to investigate that. Code coverage buildbots would indeed be good. I

Re: [Python-Dev] Another buildslave - Ubuntu again

2012-05-02 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: I'm not sure how useful it is to have a build slave which you can't commit to having for more than 3 months. So I'm -0 on adding this slave, but it is up to Antoine to decide. I am likely switch to places within 3

Re: [Python-Dev] Another buildslave - Ubuntu again

2012-05-02 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote: What are the characteristics of your machine? We already have several Linux x86/x86-64 buildbots... That said, we could also toy with other build options if someone has a request about that. It is not very unique. It

[Python-Dev] Another buildslave - Ubuntu again

2012-05-01 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hello, I just got a Ubuntu Server running at my disposal, which could be connected 24/7 for at least next 3 months. I am not sure how helpful it would be to have another buildbot on Ubuntu, but i wanted to play with it for a while (as I have more comfort with Ubuntu than any other Unix flavor)

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (3.2): #14236: fix docs for \S.

2012-04-30 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37:25PM +0200, ezio.melotti wrote: range of Unicode whitespace characters. -\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equiv. to [^ \t\n\r\f\v]. +\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equivalent to [^\s]. Is this correct? While I

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into the stdlib? Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in 3.2 and 3.3. I

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: issue2193 - Update docs about the legal characters allowed in Cookie name

2012-04-23 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:  issue2193 - Update docs about the legal characters allowed in Cookie name You missed the dummy merge from 3.2 to indicate that this change had been applied to both branches independently. Yes. Sorry for that. I was being

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: use assertWarns instead of check_warnings - Issue14341

2012-04-12 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:33:30PM +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: + +with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning) as cm: req.add_data(data) There's no need for adding the as cm if you don't need the cm object. I overlooked. Thanks for spotting. I have corrected it. --

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #3033: Add displayof parameter to tkinter font.

2012-04-07 Thread Senthil Kumaran
Hi Andrew, On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:16:54PM +0300, Andrew Svetlov wrote: I tried to: andrew@tiktaalik2 ~/projects hg clone ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython ssh://h...@hg.python.org/sandbox/tkdocs repo created, public URL is http://hg.python.org/sandbox/tkdocs abort: clone from remote to

Re: [Python-Dev] lzma

2012-03-16 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:30:31PM -0700, Andrew Svetlov wrote: When I build python from sources I have no lzma support (module _lzma cannot be built). I have liblzma-dev, liblzma2 and lzma packages installed on ubuntu. I am able to build and import lzma module. Thanks, Senthil

Re: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives

2012-03-13 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:48:04PM -0700, Andrey Petrov wrote: @Senthil: I originally asked Guido for guidance on improving the standard library and perhaps including some of my favourite projects, but he pointed out that in a couple of years we might end up again in the same position as

Re: [Python-Dev] Docs of weak stdlib modules should encourage exploration of 3rd-party alternatives

2012-03-12 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 07:23:11PM -0700, Andrey Petrov wrote: I've had the pleasure of speaking with Guido at PyCon and it became evident that some of Python's included batteries are significantly lagging behind the rapidly-evolving defacto standards of the community specifically in cases like

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP czar for PEP 3144?

2012-02-20 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:07 AM, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: supreme ruler sounds good to me. I could go for inquisitor instead of czar as well... But that would be bad for developers from Spain as nobody would expect a spanish inquisition. :-) -- Senthil

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.7 now uses Sphinx 1.0

2012-01-20 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:05:41PM +, Chris Withers wrote: That's great news, does that now mean the objects inventory for Python 2.7 and Python 3 on python.org now supports referring to section headers from 3rd party packages? Nope. It does not seem to have any relation to that. Would

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 407: New release cycle and introducing long-term support versions

2012-01-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:26:19PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: My original suggestion to Antoine and Georg for 3.4 was that we simply propose to Larry Hastings (the 3.4 RM) that we spread out the release cycle, releasing the first alpha after ~6 months, the second after about ~12, then rolling

Re: [Python-Dev] Python 3.4 Release Manager

2011-11-22 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote: I've volunteered to be the Release Manager for Python 3.4.  The FLUFL has That's cool. But just my thought, wouldn't it be better for someone who regularly commits, fixes bugs and feature requests be better for a RM

Re: [Python-Dev] Is Python insider blog dead?

2011-11-16 Thread Senthil Kumaran
No. I think, you are welcome to write something about the recent changes you made to Python. -- Senthil On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:40:06PM +0100, Jesús Cea wrote: Python insider blog was a great idea, trying to open and expose python-dev to the world. A great and necessary idea. But the

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Fix closes Issue12529 - cgi.parse_header failure on double quotes and

2011-10-20 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:17:10AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: NEWS entry? (same question for the later _sre fix) Added. Thanks for catching this. For some reason, I had slight doubt, if those issues were NEWS worthy items. IIRC, devguide recommends that a NEWS entry be added for all fixes

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Fixes #10860: Handle empty port after port delimiter in httplib

2011-10-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote: Looks like your entry went into the Interpreter Core section instead of Library. That should be corrected. BTW, I don’t understand “3.x version will come as a separate patch” in I think, he meant in a separate commit.

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (2.7): Fix closes Issue12722 - link heapq source in the text format in the

2011-08-10 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:58:24PM +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote: hg.python.org/cpython/2.7/path/to/file.py should work just fine. The correct path seems to be: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/modulefile.py IIRC the reason why we don't do it on 2.x is because we don't have the

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): Fix closes Issue12676 - Invalid identifier used in TypeError message in

2011-08-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:16:01PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: There are still a lot of spaces in your message. You should use string Yes, did not realize that.. :( Georg fixed this in his commit. Thanks, Senthil ___ Python-Dev mailing list

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): Fix closes issue12683 - urljoin to work with relative join of svn scheme.

2011-08-03 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:23:19PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: This is the same test repeated. Perhaps you meant svn+ssh? oops, thanks for the catch. yes, I did mean svn+ssh. I shall change it. -- Senthil ___ Python-Dev mailing list

  1   2   3   >