On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 2:25 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I know PEP 646 was one of these.
>
I purposefully didn't "out" anyone, but yes.
> In our defense, we *did* notify the SC that there was a pending issue (
> https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/59#issuecomment-951728233),
FWIW that seems like a reasonable approach, at least to me.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 5:29 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I know PEP 646 was one of these. In our defense, we *did* notify the SC
> that there was a pending issue (
>
I know PEP 646 was one of these. In our defense, we *did* notify the SC
that there was a pending issue (
https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/59#issuecomment-951728233),
although at the time we didn't anticipate it to become such a contentious
discussion between the PEP authors.
