Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23

2005-08-23 Thread Fredrik Lundh
Gareth McCaughan wrote: It's valid C99, meaning this is an unsigned long long. since when does Python require C99 compilers? /F ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe:

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23

2005-08-23 Thread Gareth McCaughan
On Tuesday 2005-08-23 16:51, Fredrik Lundh wrote: Gareth McCaughan wrote: It's valid C99, meaning this is an unsigned long long. since when does Python require C99 compilers? /F It doesn't, of course, and I hope it won't for a good while. I was just responding to this: | Perhaps OS

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins]python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23

2005-08-23 Thread Raymond Hettinger
[Gareth] It's valid C99, meaning this is an unsigned long long. /F since when does Python require C99 compilers? Except from PEP 7: Use ANSI/ISO standard C (the 1989 version of the standard). ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23

2005-08-23 Thread Michael Hudson
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gareth McCaughan wrote: It's valid C99, meaning this is an unsigned long long. since when does Python require C99 compilers? Well, it doesn't, but Raymond was suggesting the code was GCC specific, or something. Cheers, mwh -- Check out the

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23

2005-08-23 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 11:51, Fredrik Lundh wrote: Gareth McCaughan wrote: It's valid C99, meaning this is an unsigned long long. since when does Python require C99 compilers? Why, since Python 3.0 of course! wink -Barry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message