On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:27:14 -0400 Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > > First of all, I'm sorry if I'm wrong. I'm not lawyer. > > > > You can use both of GPL and MIT. Users can use your package under it. > > > > On the other hand, when you publish your package, *you* should follow > > PSF license. > > Read this. https://docs.python.org/3/license.html > > > > """ > > 3. In the event Licensee prepares a derivative work that is based on or > > incorporates Python 3.7.2 or any part thereof, and wants to make the > > derivative work available to others as provided herein, then Licensee > > hereby > > agrees to include in any such work a brief summary of the changes > > made to Python > > 3.7.2. > > """ > > > > As you can see, PSF license doesn't force you to use PSF license. (not > > "copyleft") > > In fact, the PSF lawyer says one should not use the 'PSF license' as it > is specilized for the PSF and Python.
Interesting. I did use the PSF license for the pickle5 backport and I suspect I'm not the only one to use it (though I don't know how to do a per-license search on PyPI). https://pypi.org/project/pickle5/ Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
