Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com writes:
Are you concerned about the evolution of various code checkers?
Do you have questions or suggestions?
Subscribe here:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
Now available via Gmane also
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Alfredo Solano Martínez asol...@icai.es wrote:
Hi,
Are you planning to cover the code quality of the interpreter itself
too? I've been recently reading through the cert.org secure coding
practice recommendations and was wondering if there has is any ongoing
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Alfredo,
We do not currently have any tools to do that, but it would definitely
be something interesting to discuss and maybe design on the list. I'm
sure there are static analysis tools for the C part and I'm
Le Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:57:14 +0200,
Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com a écrit :
Are you planning to cover the code quality of the interpreter itself
too? I've been recently reading through the cert.org secure coding
practice recommendations and was wondering if there has is any
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:57:14 +0200,
Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com a écrit :
Are you planning to cover the code quality of the interpreter itself
too? I've been recently reading through the cert.org
Hello,
There's a new mailing-list related to Python code-quality tools.
Are you concerned about the evolution of various code checkers?
Do you have questions or suggestions?
Subscribe here:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
Best regards,
Ian
Hi,
Are you planning to cover the code quality of the interpreter itself
too? I've been recently reading through the cert.org secure coding
practice recommendations and was wondering if there has is any ongoing
effort to perform static analysis on the cpython codebase.
Thanks,
Alfredo
On Wed,
Are you planning to cover the code quality of the interpreter itself
too? I've been recently reading through the cert.org secure coding
practice recommendations and was wondering if there has is any ongoing
effort to perform static analysis on the cpython codebase.
AFAICT CPython already
On 4/3/13, Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you planning to cover the code quality of the interpreter itself
too? I've been recently reading through the cert.org secure coding
practice recommendations and was wondering if there has is any ongoing
effort to perform static
