(Resending to python-dev instead of python-checkins)
Any objections to applying something like the following to address the
recent spate of buildbot failures in test_posixpath:test_islink?
Index: Lib/test/test_posixpath.py
--- Lib/test/test_posixpath.py (revision 54248)
+++ Lib/test/test_posixpath.py (working copy)
@@ -150,6 +150,11 @@
os.remove(test_support.TESTFN)
def test_islink(self):
+ try:
+ os.remove(test_support.TESTFN + "2")
+ except os.error:
+ pass
+
self.assertIs(posixpath.islink(test_support.TESTFN + "1"), False)
f = open(test_support.TESTFN + "1", "wb")
try:
Collin Winter
On 3/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of g4 osx.4 trunk.
> Full details are available at:
> http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/g4%2520osx.4%2520trunk/builds/1814
>
> Buildbot URL: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/
>
> Build Reason:
> Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] HEAD
> Blamelist: collin.winter,thomas.heller
>
> Build had warnings: warnings test
>
> Excerpt from the test logfile:
> 1 test failed:
> test_posixpath
>
> make: *** [buildbottest] Error 1
>
> sincerely,
> -The Buildbot
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-checkins mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
