On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Cesare Di Mauro
cesare.dima...@a-tono.com wrote:
Also, I checked out wpython at head to run Unladen Swallow's
benchmarks against it, but it refuses to compile with either gcc 4.0.1
or 4.3.1 on Linux (fails in Python/ast.c). I can send you the build
failures
Hi Mart
I had some problems and little time to dedicate to wpython in the last
period, but I restarted again with it in the last month.
Currently I'm working on changing and documenting the code so that almost
every optimization can be selected. So you'll compile it enabling only the
ones you
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Mart Sõmermaa mrts.py...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Cesare Di Mauro
cesare.dima...@a-tono.com wrote:
Also, I checked out wpython at head to run Unladen Swallow's
benchmarks against it, but it refuses to compile with either gcc 4.0.1
or
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Collin Winter coll...@gmail.com wrote:
Do note that the --track_memory option to perf.py imposes some
overhead that interferes with the performance figures.
Thanks for the notice, without -m/--track_memory the deviation in
results is indeed much smaller.
I'd
On Mon, May 11, 2009 10:27PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hi Antoine
Hi,
WPython is a re-implementation of (some parts of) Python, which drops
support for bytecode in favour of a wordcode-based model (where a is
word
is 16 bits wide).
This is great!
Have you planned to port in to the py3k
Hi Collin
On Mon, May 11, 2009 11:14PM, Collin Winter wrote:
Hi Cesare,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Cesare Di Mauro
cesare.dima...@a-tono.com wrote:
At the last PyCon3 at Italy I've presented a new Python implementation,
which you'll find at http://code.google.com/p/wpython/
Good to
Hi Cesare,
Cesare Di Mauro cesare.dimauro at a-tono.com writes:
It was my idea too, but first I need to take a deep look at what parts
of code are changed from 2.6 to 3.0.
That's because I don't know how much work is required for this
forward port.
If you have some questions or need some
On Thu, May 12, 2009 01:40PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hi Cesare,
Cesare Di Mauro cesare.dimauro at a-tono.com writes:
It was my idea too, but first I need to take a deep look at what parts
of code are changed from 2.6 to 3.0.
That's because I don't know how much work is required for this
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Cesare Di Mauro
cesare.dima...@a-tono.com wrote:
Another note. Fredrik Johansson let me note just few minutes ago that I've
compiled my sources without PGO optimizations enabled.
That's because I used Visual Studio Express Edition.
So another gain in
On Tue, May 12, 2009 05:27 PM, Collin Winter wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Cesare Di Mauro
cesare.dima...@a-tono.com wrote:
Another note. Fredrik Johansson let me note just few minutes ago that
I've
compiled my sources without PGO optimizations enabled.
That's because I used
At the last PyCon3 at Italy I've presented a new Python implementation,
which you'll find at http://code.google.com/p/wpython/
WPython is a re-implementation of (some parts of) Python, which drops
support for bytecode in favour of a wordcode-based model (where a is word
is 16 bits wide).
It also
Hi,
WPython is a re-implementation of (some parts of) Python, which drops
support for bytecode in favour of a wordcode-based model (where a is word
is 16 bits wide).
This is great!
Have you planned to port in to the py3k branch? Or, at least, to trunk?
Some opcode and VM optimizations have
Hi Cesare,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Cesare Di Mauro
cesare.dima...@a-tono.com wrote:
At the last PyCon3 at Italy I've presented a new Python implementation,
which you'll find at http://code.google.com/p/wpython/
Good to see some more attention on Python performance! There's quite a
13 matches
Mail list logo
