Delaney, Timothy (Tim) wrote:
Looks like there's a bug in Popen.__del__ in 2.5. I'm not in a position
to have a look right now.
For those not watching python-checkins, a check for is not None has been
added before the offending line in Popen.__del__. (by Georg, IIRC)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick
On 7/21/06, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) wrote: Looks like there's a bug in Popen.__del__ in 2.5. I'm not in a position to have a look right now.For those not watching python-checkins, a check for is not None has been
added before the offending line in
Kevin Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/21/06, *Nick Coghlan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delaney, Timothy (Tim) wrote:
Looks like there's a bug in Popen.__del__ in 2.5. I'm not in a
position
to have a look right now.
For those not
The is _active check, unless it intendeds to check for either empty or
None, should probably be revised to:
def __del__(self):
# In case the child hasn't been waited on, check if it's done.
self.poll(_deadstate=sys.maxint)
if self.sts 0:
if
That'll teach me to fire off emails while running out the door. Thanks.-KevinOn 7/21/06, John Benediktsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The is _active check, unless it intendeds to check for either empty or
None, should probably be revised to: def __del__(self): # In case the child hasn't been
Larry Hastings wrote:
I run the following script:
--
from subprocess import *
Popen(ls -l)
--
(yeah, I have ls.exe on Windows)
Under Python 2.4.2, this simply dumped the results of ls.exe to the
terminal--sorry, to the command shell.
Under Python 2.5, both beta 1 and beta 2, it dumps
Reported to the list about a week ago, with analysis. Didn't get a response. Won't use sourceforge. Sorry about the top post.-KevinOn 7/20/06, Delaney, Timothy (Tim)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Larry Hastings wrote:
I run the following script: -- from subprocess import * Popen(ls -l) -- (yeah, I
