Nick Coghlan wrote:
Collin Winter wrote:
That would be a bikeshed discussion of such
magnitude, you'd have to invent new colors to paint the thing.
Octarine. Definitely octarine :)
I'm not so sure of the color itself, but its name should definitely
rhyme with "orange."
--Scott David Daniels
2009/3/27 Thomas Wouters :
> It's not a matter of chipping away support. It's a matter of wishing to not
> write our own JIT, but rather leverage other people's work. That currently
> means LLVM, but LLVM has a weak Windows story at the moment.
Ah, I see. That's much more encouraging. On the other
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/3/27 Collin Winter :
>> In particular, Windows support is one of those things we'll need to
>> address on our end. LLVM's Windows support may be spotty, or there may
>> be other Windows issues we inadvertently introduce. None of the three
>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:50, Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/3/27 Collin Winter :
> > In particular, Windows support is one of those things we'll need to
> > address on our end. LLVM's Windows support may be spotty, or there may
> > be other Windows issues we inadvertently introduce. None of the three
Collin Winter wrote:
> That would be a bikeshed discussion of such
> magnitude, you'd have to invent new colors to paint the thing.
Octarine. Definitely octarine :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
-
2009/3/27 Collin Winter :
> In particular, Windows support is one of those things we'll need to
> address on our end. LLVM's Windows support may be spotty, or there may
> be other Windows issues we inadvertently introduce. None of the three
> of us have Windows machines, nor do we particularly want
Collin Winter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
An ars technica articla just linked to in a python-list post
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
calls the following project "Google launched"
htt
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 18:05, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> If one adds type annotations so that values can be unboxed, would not
>> Cython, etc, do even better for speedup?
>
> Nope as Unladen is planning to re-implement the eval loop, something Cython
> doesn't optimize without th
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Collin Winter wrote:
>> In fact, right now I'm adding a last few tests before putting our cPickle
>> patches up on the tracker for further review.
>>
>
> Put me in the nosy list when you do; and when
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Collin Winter wrote:
> In fact, right now I'm adding a last few tests before putting our cPickle
> patches up on the tracker for further review.
>
Put me in the nosy list when you do; and when I get some free time, I
will give your patches a complete review. I've
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> An ars technica articla just linked to in a python-list post
>
> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
>
> calls the following project "Google launched"
> http://code.googl
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 18:05, Terry Reedy wrote:
> An ars technica articla just linked to in a python-list post
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
>
> calls the following project "Google launched"
> http://code.goog
An ars technica articla just linked to in a python-list post
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
calls the following project "Google launched"
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
(Though the project
13 matches
Mail list logo
