On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Hi,
Some months ago, I proposed a patch to display the Python backtrace on a
segfault. The API was not stable, it was too for Python 3.2, and it was
enabled by default. I wrote a module instead of a patch so
Le vendredi 04 mars 2011 à 21:10 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
Some months ago, I proposed a patch to display the Python backtrace on a
segfault. The API was not stable, it was too for Python 3.2, and it was
enabled by default. I wrote a module instead of a patch so it can be
used on any
On 3/4/2011 6:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
So, what do you think?
Something we may want to consider is enabling it by default in
interactive mode, and also when `-i` is specified on the command line.
I am
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Scott Dial
scott+python-...@scottdial.com wrote:
I am still bothered by the fact that,
import faulthandler
faulthandler.enable()
import sys
sys.stderr.close()
sys.stderr = open('logs/error.log', 'wb')
faulthandler.sigsegv()
, does the wrong thing. In this
Le vendredi 04 mars 2011 à 06:32 -0500, Scott Dial a écrit :
On 3/4/2011 6:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
So, what do you think?
Something we may want to consider is enabling it by default in
interactive
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:40:16 +0100
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
I am still bothered by the fact that,
import faulthandler
faulthandler.enable()
import sys
sys.stderr.close()
sys.stderr = open('logs/error.log', 'wb')
faulthandler.sigsegv()
, does
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Some months ago, I proposed a patch to display the Python backtrace on a
segfault. The API was not stable, it was too for Python 3.2, and it was
enabled by default. I wrote a module instead of a patch so it can
Le vendredi 04 mars 2011 à 15:05 +0200, Simon Cross a écrit :
While I like this module I'm against it going into the standard
library so soon. Modules need time to mature, develop and gain wide
adoption outside the standard library where they are less constrained
by maintaining compatibility
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Simon Cross
hodgestar+python...@gmail.com wrote:
There may be reasons for including a shiny new module in the standard
library despite the drawbacks (the rest of the standard library might
wish to use the new feature, for example). If there are such reasons
it
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
faulthandler is also a little bit special, because it is very specific
to CPython: it is based on CPython internal structures.
If faulthandler is a public part of the standard library, what should
other Python
2011/3/4 Simon Cross hodgestar+python...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
faulthandler is also a little bit special, because it is very specific
to CPython: it is based on CPython internal structures.
If faulthandler is a public
Hi,
Some months ago, I proposed a patch to display the Python backtrace on a
segfault. The API was not stable, it was too for Python 3.2, and it was
enabled by default. I wrote a module instead of a patch so it can be
used on any version of Python, and it has a better API. And now I would
like to
12 matches
Mail list logo