Greetings.
I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to
constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I
understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches,
but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message
yesterday, but no one
http://bugs.python.org/issue22619
Possible implementation of negative limit for traceback functions
I see that Serhiy Storchaka reviewed a patch.
Victor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov jsb...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to
constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I
understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches,
but 2
Thank you for pointing this out. That's what I meant when I asked to
say what's wrong with it :-) I fixed the latest patch and uploaded
it.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Stefan Ring stefan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov jsb...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings.
