On 9 Dec 2014 08:47, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Dec 09, 2014, at 09:31 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Rather, I'm asking what, specifically, necessitates this situation.
What would need to change, for the PSF to accept contributions to the
Python copyrighted works, without requiring
On Dec 09, 2014, at 07:42 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
A more restricted CLA that limited the PSF's outgoing licence choices to
OSI approved open source licenses might address some of the concerns
without causing problems elsewhere, but the combination of being both
interested in core development and
Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com writes:
There's no real way around this, is there? […] the CLA part is pretty
unavoidable.
The PSF presently madates that any contributor to Python sign
URL:http://legacy.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/contributor-agreement.pdf
the “Contributor
On Dec 09, 2014, at 09:31 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Rather, I'm asking what, specifically, necessitates this situation.
What would need to change, for the PSF to accept contributions to the
Python copyrighted works, without requiring the contributor to do
anything but license the work under Apache
