2009-05-02 07:34:15 Stephen J. Turnbull napisał(a):
Barry Warsaw writes:
On May 1, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
P for Proposal (to replace Active Proposal)? Every active PEP is a
proposal...
+1
Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ?
Shouldn't that be
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
..
leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated.
'X' or 'Z' for Rejected? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed
discussion. :-)
Are there Unicode codepoints for smilies? I'm thinking of :-) for
'Accepted' and :-( for 'Rejected'. :-)
MRAB wrote:
Are there Unicode codepoints for smilies? I'm thinking of :-) for
'Accepted' and :-( for 'Rejected'. :-)
Yes there are, but we'd need to set the font size to 'humongous' to
see the smilies: ☹ ☺.
In py3k: print(chr(0x2639), chr(0x263a))
In trunk: print(unichr(0x2639),
On Sat, 2 May 2009, MRAB wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
..
leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated.
'X' or 'Z' for Rejected? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed
discussion. :-)
Are there Unicode codepoints for smilies? I'm thinking of :-) for
'Accepted' and
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com writes:
2009-05-02 07:34:15 Stephen J. Turnbull napisał(a):
Barry Warsaw writes:
Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ?
Shouldn't that be
s/Active/Proposed/g
No.
From `info sed 'sed Programs' 'The s Command'`:
Stephen
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being 'A', for example?
- A - Accepted proposal
- R - Rejected proposal
W - Withdrawn proposal
- D -
2009/5/1 MRAB goo...@mrabarnett.plus.com:
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being 'A', for example?
- A - Accepted proposal
- R - Rejected
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/5/1 MRAB goo...@mrabarnett.plus.com:
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being 'A', for example?
- A - Accepted
MRAB wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/5/1 MRAB goo...@mrabarnett.plus.com:
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being 'A', for
example?
-
On May 1, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
P for Proposal (to replace Active Proposal)? Every active PEP is a
proposal...
+1
Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ?
-Barry
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Michael Foord wrote:
MRAB wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/5/1 MRAB goo...@mrabarnett.plus.com:
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being
..
leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated.
'X' or 'Z' for Rejected? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed
discussion. :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Barry Warsaw writes:
On May 1, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
P for Proposal (to replace Active Proposal)? Every active PEP is a
proposal...
+1
Maybe even s/Active/Proposed/g ?
Shouldn't that be
s/Active/Proposed/g
duck /
Alexander Belopolsky writes:
..
leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated.
'X' or 'Z' for Rejected? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed
discussion. :-)
The Japanese contingent suggests O (UPPERCASE LATIN LETTER O) for
accepted and X for rejected. (Actually
14 matches
Mail list logo
