Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-28 Thread Nick Coghlan
Brett Cannon wrote: Anyway, as soon as the cron job posts the PEP to the web site (already checked into the new svn repository) have a read and start expounding about how wonderful it is and that there is no qualms with it whatsoever. =) You mean aside from the implementation of __getitem__

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-28 Thread Guido van Rossum
On 10/28/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brett Cannon wrote: Anyway, as soon as the cron job posts the PEP to the web site (already checked into the new svn repository) have a read and start expounding about how wonderful it is and that there is no qualms with it whatsoever. =)

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-28 Thread Brett Cannon
On 10/28/05, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/28/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brett Cannon wrote: Anyway, as soon as the cron job posts the PEP to the web site (already checked into the new svn repository) have a read and start expounding about how wonderful

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-28 Thread Nick Coghlan
Brett Cannon wrote: On 10/28/05, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nick got the python-checkins email and then read the PEP from the repository (or at least that is what I assume since that is how Neal managed to catch the PEP literally in under 5 minutes after checkin). Actually,

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-28 Thread Brett Cannon
On 10/28/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brett Cannon wrote: On 10/28/05, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nick got the python-checkins email and then read the PEP from the repository (or at least that is what I assume since that is how Neal managed to catch the PEP

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-28 Thread Guido van Rossum
[Trying to cut this short... We have too many threads for this topic. :-( ] On 10/28/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [on making args b/w compatible] I agree changing the behaviour is highly unlikely to cause any serious problems (mainly because anyone *caring* about the contents of

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-28 Thread Brett Cannon
On 10/28/05, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Trying to cut this short... We have too many threads for this topic. :-( ] On 10/28/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [on making args b/w compatible] I agree changing the behaviour is highly unlikely to cause any serious

[Python-Dev] PEP 352: Required Superclass for Exceptions

2005-10-27 Thread Brett Cannon
Well, I am at it again, but this time Guido is a co-conspirator. We wrote a PEP that introduces BaseException and moves KeyboardInterrupt and SystemExit. Even if you followed the discussion for PEP 348 you should read the PEP since I am sure there will be something that someone doesn't like,