Guido and Antoine persuaded me that selective backports would be a
better idea for the network security enhancements than the wholesale
module backports previously suggested, while Alex and Donald provided
the necessary additional details, so here's a revised version of the
PEP. Despite making it
Typo I think:
As in the Python 3 series, the backported ssl.create_default_context() API
is granted a backwards compatibility exemption that permits the protocol,
options, cipher and other settings of the created SSL context to be made
made what?
On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Nick Coghlan
On 26 March 2014 22:05, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Typo I think:
As in the Python 3 series, the backported ssl.create_default_context() API
is granted a backwards compatibility exemption that permits the protocol,
options, cipher and other settings of the created SSL context to be
On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Guido and Antoine persuaded me that selective backports would be a
better idea for the network security enhancements than the wholesale
module backports previously suggested, while Alex and Donald provided
the necessary
On 26 Mar 2014 23:12, Cory Benfield c...@lukasa.co.uk wrote:
Nick,
On 26 March 2014 12:00, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As one example, the Python 2 ``ssl`` module does not support the Server
Name Identification standard.
Tiny note: SNI is 'Server Name Indication', not
On Mar 26, 2014, at 10:00 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Guido and Antoine persuaded me that selective backports would be a
better idea for the network security enhancements than the wholesale
module backports previously suggested, while Alex and Donald provided
the necessary additional details, so
On Wed Mar 26 2014 at 8:02:08 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Guido and Antoine persuaded me that selective backports would be a
better idea for the network security enhancements than the wholesale
module backports previously suggested, while Alex and Donald provided
the necessary
Nick,
On 26 March 2014 12:00, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As one example, the Python 2 ``ssl`` module does not support the Server
Name Identification standard.
Tiny note: SNI is 'Server Name Indication', not 'Identification'. =)
Otherwise, I'm +1 on this as well.
This mostly looks good to me, however I'm not sure I understand the point of
this sentence: Rather, it is intended to send a clear signal to potential
corporate contributors that the core development team are willing to accept
offers of corporate assistance in putting this policy into effect
On 03/26/2014 05:00 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
The Mac OS X binary installers historically followed the same policy as
other POSIX installations and dynamically linked to the Apple provided
OpenSSL libraries. However, Apple has now ceased updating these
cross-platform libraries, instead requiring
On 27 Mar 2014 01:28, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
This mostly looks good to me, however I'm not sure I understand the point
of
this sentence: Rather, it is intended to send a clear signal to potential
corporate contributors that the core development team are willing to
accept
11 matches
Mail list logo
