This seemed pretty uncontroversial. I've updated the PEP.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Here's another proposal for a change to PEP 484.
>
> In https://github.com/python/typing/issues/72 there's a long
> discussion ending with a reasonable argument to allow @overload
Here's another proposal for a change to PEP 484.
In https://github.com/python/typing/issues/72 there's a long
discussion ending with a reasonable argument to allow @overload in
(non-stub) modules after all.
This proposal does *not* sneak in a syntax for multi-dispatch -- the
@overload versions ar
