Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Looks like the quickest fix is to distribute two source packages, one
built the traditional way to eliminate breakage for people using the
current tarball layout, and one built with sdist.
Why the need for two?
Or, asked differently, who would be hurt if the distribution
At 01:26 PM 10/5/2009 +0200, Jens W. Klein wrote:
And as far as I understand PIL is not the
problem, but the packaging/ setuptools. For the records: PIL is a great
piece of software and I dont want to miss it.
Actually, the problem is that the package is called PIL in Pypi,
but the actual
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
names for the same thing. (I'm guessing that PIL was registered on PyPI
manually, before the setup.py register command existed. Heck, it was
probably being distributed before the distutils even existed, and indeed
before