Op woensdag 16-01-2008 om 02:33 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Christian
Heimes:
Bill Janssen wrote:
Good point, but I prefer ~/Library/Python to either of these.
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing. I haven't seen it on other Unix systems.
There is (at least) one linux distro using it, but it's
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op woensdag 16-01-2008 om 02:33 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Christian
Heimes:
Bill Janssen wrote:
Good point, but I prefer ~/Library/Python to either of these.
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing. I haven't seen it on other Unix
Op zondag 20-01-2008 om 20:46 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Oleg
Broytmann:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op woensdag 16-01-2008 om 02:33 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Christian
Heimes:
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing. I haven't seen it on other Unix systems.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 07:34:02PM +0100, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op zondag 20-01-2008 om 20:46 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Oleg
Broytmann:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op woensdag 16-01-2008 om 02:33 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Christian
Heimes:
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing.
Bill Sure, but it's clearly where this should be on an OS X system, by
Bill default.
I think only for stuff that is a Mac-ish GUI app type of thing and/or that
plays with Mac's distinct APIs (Carbon, Cocoa, whatever). Would you
install, for
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing.
Bill Sure, but it's clearly where this should be on an OS X system, by
Bill default.
I think only for stuff that is a Mac-ish GUI app type of thing and/or that
plays with Mac's distinct APIs (Carbon, Cocoa, whatever). Would you
install, for
Bill Janssen writes:
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing.
Bill Sure, but it's clearly where this should be on an OS X system, by
Bill default.
[etc.]
[tocatta and fugue ad lib]
Doesn't Apple publish standards for this? They do for everything
else, it seems.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:12:52AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
- Bill Janssen writes:
- ~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing.
-
-Bill Sure, but it's clearly where this should be on an OS X
system, by
-Bill default.
-
-[etc.]
-
- [tocatta and fugue ad lib]
-
-
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:57:02 -0500, Kevin Jacobs wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 6:24 AM, Oleg Broytmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:41:47PM +, Jon Ribbens wrote:
It makes sense, but personally I have never heard before of ~/.local.
Whereas ~/bin is something I am
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:11:37PM -0800, Daniel Arbuckle wrote:
I use ~/local, with a layout analogous to /usr, all the time. It's not
a standard, but in my experience it is by far the best solution to
installing things in the home directory. It doesn't matter much
whether you call it local
Daniel I use ~/local, with a layout analogous to /usr, ...
Ditto. Makes things nice and clear. I install stuff without becoming root
or polluting central directories.
Daniel To those folks who favor creating ~/bin, ~/lib, ~/share, ad
Daniel nauseum, I point out that non-hidden,
Oleg~/.python
Oleg~/.python/bin
Oleg~/.python/lib
Oleg~/.python/lib/python2.5
The drawback of this approach is that it implies that Perl, Tcl, IPython,
etc. belong in their own .whatever directory. The IT folks here at work do
things that way (though not in home
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:34:02PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oleg~/.python
Oleg~/.python/bin
Oleg~/.python/lib
Oleg~/.python/lib/python2.5
The drawback of this approach is that it implies that Perl, Tcl, IPython,
etc. belong in their own .whatever
Oleg Broytmann writes:
~/.python
To me, this strongly suggests user configuration files, not a place
where an app can store user-specific packages.
True, there are apps that store their stuff in such places, like most
GNOME apps. But they have no user-servicable parts (including config
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 06:31:42AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I think both for UI reasons (given above) and for API reasons (given
by others) there should be a separate ~/SOMETHING/{bin,etc,lib,share}
hierarchy for user-specific packaged contents. I like ~/.local a
little better than
OlegWhy not use GNU stow?
Thanks for the reference. I'd never heard of it before. I suspect our IT
folks may not have as well.
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Oleg Broytmann writes:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 06:31:42AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I think both for UI reasons (given above) and for API reasons (given
by others) there should be a separate ~/SOMETHING/{bin,etc,lib,share}
hierarchy for user-specific packaged contents. I like
Bill Janssen wrote:
Good point, but I prefer ~/Library/Python to either of these.
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing. I haven't seen it on other Unix systems.
I *could* add yet another environment variable PYTHONUSERHOME to set the
base path but I prefer not.
Christian
Bill Janssen wrote:
Good point, but I prefer ~/Library/Python to either of these.
~/Library/ is a Mac OS X thing. I haven't seen it on other Unix systems.
I *could* add yet another environment variable PYTHONUSERHOME to set the
base path but I prefer not.
Christian
Sure, but it's
Bill Janssen wrote:
Sure, but it's clearly where this should be on an OS X system, by
default. And I'm sure there's a different best place on Windows
(for instance, all of our accounts are network roaming accounts, and
you don't want to put anything in ~). And there are probably various
20 matches
Mail list logo
