On Mar 29, 2005, at 17:41, Terry Reedy wrote:
...
"Steve Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having to write
[x for x in seq]
to produce a copy of a list doesn't seem that outrageous to me,
Except for (currently) leaving the last value of sequence bound to 'x'
"Steve Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Having to write
>
> [x for x in seq]
>
> to produce a copy of a list doesn't seem that outrageous to me,
Except for (currently) leaving the last value of sequence bound to 'x'
after making the copy, how is the abov