[Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread Phillip J. Eby
While investigating the need to apply http://python.org/sf/1525766 I found that there was a modification to pkgutil during the need-for-speed sprint that affects the PEP 302 protocol in a backwards incompatible way. Specifically, PEP 302 documents that path_importer_cache always contains

Re: [Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 12:28 PM 7/20/2006 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: On 7/20/06, Phillip J. Eby mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While investigating the need to apply http://python.org/sf/1525766http://python.org/sf/1525766 I found that there was a modification to pkgutil during the need-for-speed

Re: [Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread Brett Cannon
On 7/20/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 12:28 PM 7/20/2006 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:On 7/20/06, Phillip J. Ebymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:While investigating the need to applyhttp://python.org/sf/1525766http://python.org/sf/1525766 I foundthat there was a

Re: [Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread glyph
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:57:07 -0400, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While investigating the need to apply http://python.org/sf/1525766 I found that there was a modification to pkgutil during the need-for-speed sprint that affects the PEP 302 protocol in a backwards incompatible way. It