I thought that all that was happening was that BSDDB was becoming a
separate project. If one needs BSDDB with Python2.6, one installs it.
No, not in the way you mean it.
Aren't there other parts of Python that require external modules, such as
Tk?
It's different. BSDDB (the
-On [20080904 16:22], C. Titus Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I agree. I like bsddb for just this reason and I'd like to continue
being able to use it! I think that there are many reasons why having
such a thing in the stdlib is really useful and I also think it's worth
exploring the
On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:10 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
I have to say I've never had problems with a stock install of Python
on
either Mac OS X or Windows (shockingly enough :). I think this is
good
advice for applications that rely on external libraries, but I just
don't see any problems with
-On [20080905 12:34], Kevin Teague ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
However, all does not seem to be right with the bsddb module on the
system Python 2.5 on Mac OS X 10.5:
import bsddb
[snip]
ImportError: No module named _bsddb
The bsddb module is built separately from Python within FreeBSD's
Kevin Teague wrote:
There can be subtle differences between a stock Python and the system
Python on Mac OS X 10.5.
Also there can be different versions of Python installed
in different versions of MacOSX. So if you distribute an app
that relies on the system Python, at the least you have
to
Related but tangential question that we were discussing on the
pygr[0] mailing list -- what is the official word on a scalable
object store in Python? We've been using bsddb, but is there an
alternative? And what if bsddb is removed?
Brett Beyond shelve there are no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Cannon wrote:
Related but tangential question that we were discussing on the pygr[0]
mailing list -- what is the official word on a scalable object store
in Python? We've been using bsddb, but is there an alternative? And
what if bsddb is
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 03:23:22PM +0200, Jesus Cea wrote:
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
- Hash: SHA1
-
- Brett Cannon wrote:
- Related but tangential question that we were discussing on the pygr[0]
- mailing list -- what is the official word on a scalable object store
- in Python?
At 6:10 AM -0500 9/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Related but tangential question that we were discussing on the
pygr[0] mailing list -- what is the official word on a scalable
object store in Python? We've been using bsddb, but is there an
alternative? And what if bsddb is
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:29:10AM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
- At 6:10 AM -0500 9/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Related but tangential question that we were discussing on the
- pygr[0] mailing list -- what is the official word on a scalable
- object store in Python? We've been
At 7:37 AM -0700 9/4/08, C. Titus Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:29:10AM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
...
- Shipping an application to end users is a different problem. Such packages
- should include a private copy of Python as well as of any dependent
- libraries, as tested.
Why? On Mac
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:01:35AM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
- At 7:37 AM -0700 9/4/08, C. Titus Brown wrote:
- On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:29:10AM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
- ...
- - Shipping an application to end users is a different problem. Such
packages
- - should include a private copy of
I don't think the convenience of batteries *included* should be
underestimated.
Yeah, but bsddb is one of those exploding batteries. I've used it for
years, and have had lots and lots of problems with it. Having SQLite
in there is great; now we need implementations of anydbm and shelve
which
I have to say I've never had problems with a stock install of Python on
either Mac OS X or Windows (shockingly enough :). I think this is good
I agree. I just use the stock Python on OS X and Windows. And it
seems to work well for my rather large and complicated (PIL, PyLucene,
Medusa,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
C. Titus Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 03:23:22PM +0200, Jesus Cea wrote:
- Brett Cannon wrote:
- Related but tangential question that we were discussing on the pygr[0]
- mailing list -- what is the official word on a scalable object
Compared to sqlite, you don't need to know SQL, you can finetuning
(for example, using ACI instead of ACID, deciding store by store), and
you can do replication and distributed transactions (useful, for
example, if your storage is bigger than a single machine capacity,
Doesn't SQLlite still have a 4gb cap?
I'd personally prefer an open source solution (if that's Berkeley so be it
but there's plenty out there... MySQL for one)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
never mind about the limit... I was thinking SQL Express
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jeff Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't SQLlite still have a 4gb cap?
I'd personally prefer an open source solution (if that's Berkeley so be it
but there's plenty out there... MySQL for one)
--
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:25:43AM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
Yeah, but bsddb is one of those exploding batteries. I've used it for
years, and have had lots and lots of problems with it. Having SQLite
in there is great; now we need implementations of anydbm and shelve
which use it.
What
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:01:47PM +0200, Jesus Cea wrote:
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
- Hash: SHA1
-
- C. Titus Brown wrote:
- Since I/we want to distribute pygr to end-users, this is really not a
- pleasant prospect. Also often the installation of Python itself goes
- much more
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compared to sqlite, you don't need to know SQL, you can finetuning
(for example, using ACI instead of ACID, deciding store by store), and
you can do replication and distributed transactions (useful, for
example, if
me I suggested in another message (perhaps on another thread) that
me maybe a dbm.sqlite module would be worth having.
http://bugs.python.org/issue3783
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me I suggested in another message (perhaps on another thread) that
me maybe a dbm.sqlite module would be worth having.
http://bugs.python.org/issue3783
I did a similar thing today. I can post my version later today.
- Josiah
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 04:41:32PM -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
- I think this should be deferred to Py3.1.
-
- This decision was not widely discussed and
- I think it likely that some users will
- be surprised and dismayed. The release
- candidate seems to be the wrong time to
- yank this
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:56 PM, C. Titus Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 04:41:32PM -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
- I think this should be deferred to Py3.1.
-
- This decision was not widely discussed and
- I think it likely that some users will
- be surprised and
25 matches
Mail list logo
