Hi all --
I am interested in making some serious ongoing contributions around
multiprocessing.
My inspiration, first and foremost, comes from the current documentation
for multiprocessing. There is great material there but I believe it is
being presented in a way that hinders adoption and
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:08:07 -0800, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 01/08/2015 03:21 PM, Davin Potts wrote:
I am interested in making some serious ongoing contributions around
multiprocessing.
Great!
Rather than me simply walking through that backlog, offering comments or
Thanks! That sounds like a nice, clear path forward.
Regarding the doc issues being a bit more problematic to work through, I
thoroughly understand.
Davin
On Jan 8, 2015, at 21:19, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:08:07 -0800, Ethan Furman
On 9 January 2015 at 14:20, Davin Potts pyt...@discontinuity.net wrote:
Thanks! That sounds like a nice, clear path forward.
Regarding the doc issues being a bit more problematic to work through, I
thoroughly understand.
In the case of changes to the multiprocessing docs, accepting larger
On 01/08/2015 03:21 PM, Davin Potts wrote:
I am interested in making some serious ongoing contributions around
multiprocessing.
Great!
Rather than me simply walking through that backlog, offering comments or
encouragement here and there on issues, it
makes more sense for me to ask:
