On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 06:03, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> On 15May2019 1248, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > I don't care about the deprecation either way. But can we fix the
> > individual decorators so both orders work? Even if it requires a special
> > case in the code, it seems worthwhile to remove a
On Wed, 15 May 2019 13:00:16 -0700
Steve Dower wrote:
> On 15May2019 1248, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > I don't care about the deprecation either way. But can we fix the
> > individual decorators so both orders work? Even if it requires a special
> > case in the code, it seems worthwhile to
On 15May2019 1248, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
I don't care about the deprecation either way. But can we fix the
individual decorators so both orders work? Even if it requires a special
case in the code, it seems worthwhile to remove a subtle user-visible
footgun.
The classmethod and staticmethod
I don't care about the deprecation either way. But can we fix the
individual decorators so both orders work? Even if it requires a special
case in the code, it seems worthwhile to remove a subtle user-visible
footgun.
On Wed, May 15, 2019, 12:39 Ethan Furman wrote:
> In issue 11610*
In issue 11610* abstractclassmethod and abstractstaticmethod were deprecated,
apparently because they were redundant with the new technique of calling
`classmethod` or `staticmethod` followed by a call to `abstractmethod`. To put
it in code:
# deprecated
class Foo(ABC):
