On Feb 16, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Benji York wrote:
Alexander Schremmer wrote:
In fact, PHP does it like php.net/functionname which is even
shorter, i.e.
they fallback to the documentation if that path does not exist
otherwise.
Like many things PHP, that seems a bit too magical for my
Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 16, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Benji York wrote:
Alexander Schremmer wrote:
In fact, PHP does it like php.net/functionname which is even
shorter, i.e.
they fallback to the documentation if that path does not exist
otherwise.
Like many things PHP, that seems a bit
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:13:14 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
If something like Fredrik's new doc system is adopted, it would be extremely
convenient to refer someone to just
docs.python.org/os.path.join
In fact, PHP does it like php.net/functionname which is even shorter, i.e.
they fallback to
Alexander Schremmer wrote:
In fact, PHP does it like php.net/functionname which is even shorter, i.e.
they fallback to the documentation if that path does not exist otherwise.
Like many things PHP, that seems a bit too magical for my tastes.
--
Benji York
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
I don't think this message is on-topic for python-dev. There are lots
of great places to discuss the design of the python web site, but the
list for developers doesn't seem like a good place for it. Do we need
a different list for people to gripe^H^H^H^H^H discuss the
Guido van Rossum wrote:
(Now that I work for Google I realize more than ever before the
importance of keeping URLs stable; PageRank(tm) numbers don't get
transferred as quickly as contents. I have this worry too in the
context of the python.org redesign; 301 permanent redirect is *not*
going
On 2/15/06, Tim Parkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
(Now that I work for Google I realize more than ever before the
importance of keeping URLs stable; PageRank(tm) numbers don't get
transferred as quickly as contents. I have this worry too in the
context of the
Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 2/15/06, Tim Parkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I have this worry too in the
context of the python.org redesign; 301 permanent redirect is *not*
going to help PageRank of the new page.)
Could you expand on why 301 redirects won't help with the
As I said in an earlier message, there's no need to have a separate
domain to restrict queries to just the doc/current part of python.org.
Just type
site:python.org/doc/current your query here
If there isn't any other rationale, maybe we can redirects
docs.python.org back to www.python.org?
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
As I said in an earlier message, there's no need to have a separate
domain to restrict queries to just the doc/current part of python.org.
Just type
site:python.org/doc/current your query here
If there isn't any other rationale, maybe we can redirects
docs.python.org
Georg Brandl wrote:
If something like Fredrik's new doc system is adopted, it would be extremely
convenient to refer someone to just
docs.python.org/os.path.join
without looking up how the page is actually named.
you could of course reserve a toplevel directory for that purpose; e.g.
Georg Brandl wrote:
If something like Fredrik's new doc system is adopted
don't hold your breath, by the way. it's clear that the current PSF-sponsored
site overhaul won't lead to anything remotely close to a best-of-breed python-
powered site, and I'm beginning to think that I should spend my
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Georg Brandl wrote:
If something like Fredrik's new doc system is adopted
don't hold your breath, by the way. it's clear that the current PSF-sponsored
site overhaul won't lead to anything remotely close to a best-of-breed python-
powered site, and I'm beginning to
I don't think this message is on-topic for python-dev. There are lots
of great places to discuss the design of the python web site, but the
list for developers doesn't seem like a good place for it. Do we need
a different list for people to gripe^H^H^H^H^H discuss the web site?
Jeremy
On
On 2/13/06, Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 13 February 2006 10:03, Georg Brandl wrote:
The above docs are from August 2005 while docs.python.org/dev is current.
Shouldn't the old docs be removed?
I'm afraid I've generally been too busy to chime in much on this
The above docs are from August 2005 while docs.python.org/dev is current.
Shouldn't the old docs be removed?
Georg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Shouldn't docs.python.org be removed? It seems to add mroe confusion
than anything, especially since most links on python.org continue to
point to python.org/doc/.
On 2/13/06, Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The above docs are from August 2005 while docs.python.org/dev is current.
On Monday 13 February 2006 10:03, Georg Brandl wrote:
The above docs are from August 2005 while docs.python.org/dev is current.
Shouldn't the old docs be removed?
I'm afraid I've generally been too busy to chime in much on this topic, but
I've spent a bit of time thinking about it, and would
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:52:44PM -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
What I would also like to see is to have an automatically-updated
version for each of the maintainer versions of Python, as well as
the development trunk. That would mean two versions at this point
(2.4.x, 2.5.x); only one of
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Shouldn't docs.python.org be removed? It seems to add mroe confusion
than anything, especially since most links on python.org continue to
point to python.org/doc/.
All the web says about 1200 links into the docs.python.org subdomain.
(Different to the google link
On Monday 13 February 2006 15:40, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Shouldn't docs.python.org be removed? It seems to add mroe confusion
than anything, especially since most links on python.org continue to
point to python.org/doc/.
docs.python.org was created specifically to make searching the most
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
docs.python.org was created specifically to make searching the most recent
stable version of the docs easier (using Google's site: modifier, no less).
I don't know what the link count statistics say (other than what you
mention), and don't know which gets hit more
On 2/13/06, Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 13 February 2006 15:40, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Shouldn't docs.python.org be removed? It seems to add mroe confusion
than anything, especially since most links on python.org continue to
point to python.org/doc/.
23 matches
Mail list logo
