Re: [Python-Dev] python 3.2 (fwd)

2011-02-16 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote: On 2/9/2011 12:32 PM, s...@pobox.com wrote: Passing this along from webmaster. It is hard to reply to an attachment rather than inline forwarded message.  However, with rc1 import sqlite3 sqlite3.version '2.6.0'

Re: [Python-Dev] python 3.2 (fwd)

2011-02-16 Thread Éric Araujo
import sqlite3 sqlite3.version '2.6.0' sqlite3.sqlite_version '3.7.4' That's not intuitive. It is better to point sqlite3.version to the actual version of sqlite3 used. We can’t break compatibility for such a small thing. However, it should be documented in

[Python-Dev] python 3.2 (fwd)

2011-02-09 Thread skip
Passing this along from webmaster. S ---BeginMessage--- Not sure who to address this question to. Would you please forward it as you feel is appropriate? The python 3.2 release notes say that it compiles against sqlite 2.6. Does that mean it includes the pysqlite 2.6 module which links

Re: [Python-Dev] python 3.2 (fwd)

2011-02-09 Thread Terry Reedy
On 2/9/2011 12:32 PM, s...@pobox.com wrote: Passing this along from webmaster. It is hard to reply to an attachment rather than inline forwarded message. However, with rc1 import sqlite3 sqlite3.version '2.6.0' sqlite3.sqlite_version '3.7.4' I added 'pysqlite' to the What's new entry.