The buildbots are complaining about some of tests for the new
socket.sendmsg/recvmsg added by issue #6560 for *nix platforms that
provide CMSG_LEN.
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/AMD64%20Snow%20Leopard%202%203.x/builds/831/steps/test/logs/stdio
Before I start trying to figure
The buildbots are complaining about some of tests for the new
socket.sendmsg/recvmsg added by issue #6560 for *nix platforms that
provide CMSG_LEN.
Looks like kernel bugs:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#qa/qa1541/_index.html
Yes. Mac OS X 10.5 fixes a number of kernel bugs related
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:31:50 +0200
Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr wrote:
The buildbots are complaining about some of tests for the new
socket.sendmsg/recvmsg added by issue #6560 for *nix platforms that
provide CMSG_LEN.
Looks like kernel bugs:
In article 20110824184927.2697b...@pitrou.net,
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:31:50 +0200
Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr wrote:
The buildbots are complaining about some of tests for the new
socket.sendmsg/recvmsg added by issue #6560 for *nix
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:37:20 -0700
Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article 20110824184927.2697b...@pitrou.net,
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:31:50 +0200
Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr wrote:
The buildbots are complaining about some of tests
But Snow Leopard, where these failures occur, is OS X 10.6.
*sighs*
It still looks like a kernel/libc bug to me: AFAICT, both the code and
the tests are correct.
And apparently, there are still issues pertaining to FD passing on
10.5 (and maybe later, I couldn't find a public access to their bug
In article
cah_1em30t-8g9ubdprumksl_yisclpuiffz32z4w0y1pcjj...@mail.gmail.com,
Charles-Francois Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com wrote:
But Snow Leopard, where these failures occur, is OS X 10.6.
*sighs*
It still looks like a kernel/libc bug to me: AFAICT, both the code and
the tests are
In article 20110824205047.6be49...@pitrou.net,
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:37:20 -0700
Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article 20110824184927.2697b...@pitrou.net,
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:31:50 +0200