Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
Talk has started up again on the stdlib-sig list about finding a core
stdlib + tests that can be shared by all implementations, potentially
living apart from CPython. I have volunteered to put together a PEP
on the subject, with Jessie Noller and Brett Canon are helping
Chris Withers chris at simplistix.co.uk writes:
I'm on on stdlib-sig and I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to start
on it, but I'd just like to throw in (yet again) that it would be great
if the stdlib was actually a set of separate python packages with their
own version metadata so
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
This sounds like a bad idea to me. Each Python release is tested and debugged as
a whole. If you have a lot of possible combinations (module A version 1.1 with
module B version 1.2, etc.), it becomes impossible for us to ensure proper QA
for the whole and as a result the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
Talk has started up again on the stdlib-sig list about finding a core
stdlib + tests that can be shared by all implementations, potentially
living apart from CPython.
[...]
if the
stdlib
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Chris Withers chris at simplistix.co.uk writes:
I'm on on stdlib-sig and I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to start
on it, but I'd just like to throw in (yet again) that it would be great
if the stdlib was actually
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Olemis Lang ole...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Chris Withers chris at simplistix.co.uk writes:
[...]
For instance, I have started something like that has been dome by the
FLiOOPS project [1]_
