s...@pobox.com wrote:
I guess I have my work cut out for me. It appears my preferred mail reader,
VM, is not supported out-of-the-box by GNU Emacs (they still use Rmail and
Babyl for some reason), and I'm not sure the investment trying to get XEmacs
built with MULE is worth the effort.
Use a 2
>> I guess I have my work cut out for me. It appears my preferred mail
>> reader, VM, is not supported out-of-the-box by GNU Emacs (they still
>> use Rmail and Babyl for some reason), and I'm not sure the investment
>> trying to get XEmacs built with MULE is worth the effort.
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:46:35 +0100, Jon Ribbens
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > > Mind you, I've never managed to get the <-- button working reliably
> > > either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
> >
> > No idea what that is.
>
> "Ba
On 3/27/2011 2:13 PM, Eugene Toder wrote:
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii sy
Martin> Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
>> It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
>> challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail
>> reader. (I use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support
>> utf-8 out of the
>> I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of
>> mail reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible
>> (read: fairly easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Eugene> Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Mind you, I've never managed to get the <-- button working reliably
> > either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
>
> No idea what that is.
"Backspace" key.
___
Python-De
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:13:29PM -0400, Eugene Toder wrote:
> > I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
> > reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
> > easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
>
> Isn't utf-8 itself sa
Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
> It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
> challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
> use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
> I believe you need to add MU
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:33:04 +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> In my experience it is very difficult to get a whole system
> configured, such that UTF-8 works reliably. In my case that would
> mean, I think, Linux, glibc, mutt, screen, elinks, and SecureCRT would
> all have to simultaneously be configure
On 27.03.2011 18:33, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
>> s...@pobox.com wrote:
>> > It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
>> > challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-b
> I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
> reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
> easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are used?
Eugene
___
Antoine> Hmm, are you sure? Software (especially mail-reading software)
Antoine> that doesn't support utf-8 in 2011 should be considered
Antoine> extremely broken.
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
> s...@pobox.com wrote:
> > It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
> > challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
> > use VM within XEmacs
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
> It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
> challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
> use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
> I believe you ne
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need to add MULE to it.) Is there some reason such messages
can't
16 matches
Mail list logo
