Anders == Anders J Munch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anders Unless the EULA contains specific language to forbid such
Anders multi-stage open-ended redistribution, I'd say you can
Anders just re-redistribute away.
Anders but-then-I-am-not-a-lawyer-ly y'rs, Anders
I am not either,
Anders J. Munch:
1. John X. Programmer buys the product, agrees to the EULA and puts
the DLL up for download, with the explicit and stated intent of
distributing it to anyone who needs it.
Disallowed in 3.1(a):
# you agree: ... to distribute the Redistributables only ... in
#
Neil Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anders J. Munch:
1. John X. Programmer buys the product, agrees to the EULA and puts
the DLL up for download, with the explicit and stated intent of
distributing it to anyone who needs it.
Disallowed in 3.1(a):
# you agree: ... to distribute
[Thomas Heller]
For the spambayes binary, maybe there should be another
person adding the msvcr71.dll to the distribution that Tony
builds? Someone who has a MSVC license, and also is developer
on the spambayes project?
[Tim Peters]
To the best of my knowledge, Tony is distributing my duly
Everyone went silent on this topic. Does this mean people just stopped caring
(which I doubt since I know Skip wants this bad enough to bring it up every so
often)? Was it the issue of symmetry with strftime?
I am willing to add this (albeit the simple way I proposed in my last email on
this
At 01:23 PM 2/3/05 +1300, Tony Meyer wrote:
(Users giving the software directly to someone else, rather than downloading
from the official site, is probably covered by:
You also agree not to permit further distribution of the Redistributables
by your end users except you may permit further
Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, in an amusing turn of events, the EULA actually appears to forbid the
current offering of Python for Windows, since it does not have such a
EULA.
Except of course that MS gave Python developers several copies of
