With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the docs built from the Py3k
branch? (The in-development Py3k docs are currently at dev/py3k/)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:32 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the docs built from the Py3k
branch?
Well, that page already says “Python v3.2a0 documentation” to me.
cheers
Antoine.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:32 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the docs built from the Py3k
branch?
Well,
Am 10.07.2010 10:32, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:04:32 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
With the trunk closed to new development, should we switch
http://docs.python.org/dev/ to show the
On 07/07/2010 12:30 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 07.07.2010 18:09, schrieb Michael Foord:
I would say that the major use of docstrings is for interactive help - so
interactive readability should be *the most important* (but perhaps not only)
factor when considering how to format standard
Hello,
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
I have been using IDLE since 2002 and have been doing my best to help
maintain and further develop IDLE since 2005.
In recent years IDLE has received negligible interest and attention from the
Python community. During this
On 7/10/2010 7:05 PM, Tal Einat wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
-1 I use it daily. On Windows, it works better in many ways than the
awful interactive command window, which I almost never use. I would
rather the latter be replaced.
I have
Hello Tal,
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
-1.
One of the biggest selling points for me when switching to python was the
out of the box working IDE with REPL, syntax highliting and a debugger.
The only other candidate I think of to replace IDLE might be IPython.
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 02:32:04PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
FTP access also more often reflected the actual file hierarchy of the
machine, so trying that path as a system path is more likely to work
that I'd expect to see for HTTP.
I see the reason. But I doubt if this is a reliable approach.
2010/7/10 Miki Tebeka miki.teb...@gmail.com:
Hello Tal,
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
-1.
One of the biggest selling points for me when switching to python was the
out of the box working IDE with REPL, syntax highliting and a debugger.
The only other
On Jul 10, 2010, at 9:23 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:
2010/7/10 Miki Tebeka miki.teb...@gmail.com:
Hello Tal,
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
-1.
-1 from me too.
IDLE is the tool I almost always used to introduce people to Python.
FWIW, I've run in on a Mac
11 matches
Mail list logo
