Re: [Python-Dev] We now have C code coverage!

2018-06-29 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 21:28 Terry Reedy, wrote: > On 6/24/2018 5:03 AM, Ammar Askar wrote: > >> Is it possible, given that we are not paying for those reports, to > >> customize the 'exclude_lines' definitions? > > > > Do you want to exclude python code or C code? > > Python code. > > > For Pytho

Re: [Python-Dev] Python 3.7.0 is now available! (and so is 3.6.6)

2018-06-29 Thread Eric Snow
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:05 PM Ned Deily wrote: > On behalf of the Python development community and the Python 3.7 release > team, we are pleased to announce the availability of Python 3.7.0. Thanks, Ned (and everyone), for a great job on this release! And thanks to all for yet another great Py

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

2018-06-29 Thread Python tracker
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-06-22 - 2018-06-29) Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open6705 ( +5) closed 39046 (+52) total 45751 (+57) Open issues w

Re: [Python-Dev] We now have C code coverage!

2018-06-29 Thread Terry Reedy
On 6/29/2018 9:25 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 21:28 Terry Reedy, > wrote: [question about our coverage bot] Everything is either covered by the Travis or codecov configuration files which are both checked into the cpython repo. (I'm on vacation or el

Re: [Python-Dev] We now have C code coverage!

2018-06-29 Thread Ammar Askar
Oh whoops, sorry about that. I haven't really used mailing lists before and so I assumed hitting reply in gmail would send it to python-dev, not just your personal email. Just so the config file locations are publicly documented, here's what I responded with: > For IDLE's test suite, I use a custo

Re: [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)

2018-06-29 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal via Python-Dev
> On Jun 28, 2018, at 8:21 PM, Tim Peters wrote: Seems it’s all been said, and Tim’s latest response made an excellent case for consistency. But: > Regardless of how assignment expressions work in listcomps and genexps, this > example (which uses neither) _will_ rebind the containing block's `

Re: [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)

2018-06-29 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim] >> Regardless of how assignment expressions work in listcomps and genexps, >> this example (which uses neither) _will_ rebind the containing block's `x`: > >> > >> [x := 1] > [Chris Barker] > This reinforces my point that it’s not just about comprehensions, I agree, it's not at all - and