On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 14:14 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:47 PM Steve Dower
> wrote:
> > On 11/30/2022 4:52 PM, chris...@weinigel.se wrote:
> > > Does this seem like a good idea? As I said, I feel that it is a
> > bit ugly, but it does mean that if someone wants to
> On 30 Nov 2022, at 16:59, chris...@weinigel.se wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> for quite some time I've been working on a Python implementation of a
> protocol called NTS which requires access to an API in OpenSSL which is not
> provided by the Python ssl module. I added a patch for that which
>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:47 PM Steve Dower wrote:
> On 11/30/2022 4:52 PM, chris...@weinigel.se wrote:
> > Does this seem like a good idea? As I said, I feel that it is a bit
> ugly, but it does mean that if someone wants to use some
> SSL_really_obscure_function in libcrypto or libssl they
On 11/30/2022 4:52 PM, chris...@weinigel.se wrote:
Does this seem like a good idea? As I said, I feel that it is a bit ugly, but
it does mean that if someone wants to use some SSL_really_obscure_function in
libcrypto or libssl they can do that without having to rebuild all of CPython
