On 3 Feb 2005, at 02:01, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Sounds like this puts all Python users in the clear, since Python is
the Licensee Software in that case. So, anybody can distribute
msvcr71 as part of Python.
OTOH, the other wording sounds like Python itself has to have a
click-wrap, tear-open,
Anders == Anders J Munch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anders Unless the EULA contains specific language to forbid such
Anders multi-stage open-ended redistribution, I'd say you can
Anders just re-redistribute away.
Anders but-then-I-am-not-a-lawyer-ly y'rs, Anders
I am not either,
Anders J. Munch:
1. John X. Programmer buys the product, agrees to the EULA and puts
the DLL up for download, with the explicit and stated intent of
distributing it to anyone who needs it.
Disallowed in 3.1(a):
# you agree: ... to distribute the Redistributables only ... in
#
Neil Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anders J. Munch:
1. John X. Programmer buys the product, agrees to the EULA and puts
the DLL up for download, with the explicit and stated intent of
distributing it to anyone who needs it.
Disallowed in 3.1(a):
# you agree: ... to distribute
[Thomas Heller]
For the spambayes binary, maybe there should be another
person adding the msvcr71.dll to the distribution that Tony
builds? Someone who has a MSVC license, and also is developer
on the spambayes project?
[Tim Peters]
To the best of my knowledge, Tony is distributing my duly
At 01:23 PM 2/3/05 +1300, Tony Meyer wrote:
(Users giving the software directly to someone else, rather than downloading
from the official site, is probably covered by:
You also agree not to permit further distribution of the Redistributables
by your end users except you may permit further
Thomas Heller wrote:
The 2.4 python.org installer installs msvcr71.dll on the target system.
If someone uses py2exe or a similar tool to create a frozen application,
is he allowed to redistribute this msvcr71.dll to other users together
with his application or not, even if he doesn't own MSVC?
