Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
* This didn't show up when I sent it the other day, so I'm resending it. Facundo Batista wrote: > 2007/12/10, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> This is from the search page of the tracker. >> >> >> don't care >> >> >> accepted >> >> duplicate >> fixed >> invalid >> later >> out of date >> postponed >> >> rejected >> remind >> wont fix >> works for me >> >> >> There are items in the tracker that have a resolutions set, but are still >> open. So the resolution field is the process status field. I don't think >> it needs to be mandatory. And the status field includes open/pending/close. > > Some "resolutions" imply that the issue is still open, and some imply > that the issue should be closed. > > For example, I won't expect to see the issue still open if it's marked > as "won't fix", "duplicate", "fixed", "invalid", "out of date", or > "rejected". There are open items with those items set. won't fix 4 duplicate 0 fixed 3 invalid2 out of date3 rejected 2 Some of these may have been closed and reopened at some point. > OTOH, it should be still open if the resolution is "later", or > "remind". I'm not decided with "works for me". > Anyway, as I only show the open issues, Is it "Open" issues or "Not Closed" issues? The later would include "pending" issues as well. > the resolution should be one > of the later. Do you think that is useful the color to change if it is > in "later" or "remind"? What's the benefit of this? > > Note that if we find open issues that are in the first group of > resolutions, something should be corrected there. With 1,328 Open issues, anything that may help move things along would be good. I was thinking of maybe 4 background colors + grey, (Trying to use the existing resolution terms.) light grey: no resolution yet works for me? (can't reproduce?) Positive Progression points: light green works for me? (working patch/fix available?) accepted (patch accepted) fixed (patch applied) Don't close yet: light yellow later remind postponed pending out of date? (patch no longer works?) ready to close: light red duplicate won't fix rejected invalid With darker color vertical marks for status/resolution change points. > Furthermore, I remember that somewhere there was a discussion of these > values, and if we should keep all of them or not, but I can't find > that thread. Possibly Here ... http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-November/075160.html It was pointed out that these are hold-overs for SourceForge's bug tracker, and redesigning the work flow triage is something that needs to be done. It refers to ... http://wiki.python.org/moin/TrackerDocs/ > Thank you! You're Welcome! Ron ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
Facundo Batista wrote: > 2007/12/10, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> This is from the search page of the tracker. >> >> >> don't care >> >> >> accepted >> >> duplicate >> fixed >> invalid >> later >> out of date >> postponed >> >> rejected >> remind >> wont fix >> works for me >> >> >> There are items in the tracker that have a resolutions set, but are still >> open. So the resolution field is the process status field. I don't think >> it needs to be mandatory. And the status field includes open/pending/close. > > Some "resolutions" imply that the issue is still open, and some imply > that the issue should be closed. > > For example, I won't expect to see the issue still open if it's marked > as "won't fix", "duplicate", "fixed", "invalid", "out of date", or > "rejected". There are open items with those items set. won't fix 4 duplicate 0 fixed 3 invalid2 out of date3 rejected 2 Some of these may have been closed and reopened at some point. > OTOH, it should be still open if the resolution is "later", or > "remind". I'm not decided with "works for me". > Anyway, as I only show the open issues, Is it "Open" issues or "Not Closed" issues? The later would include "pending" issues as well. the resolution should be one > of the later. Do you think that is useful the color to change if it is > in "later" or "remind"? What's the benefit of this? > > Note that if we find open issues that are in the first group of > resolutions, something should be corrected there. With 1,328 Open issues, anything that may help move things along would be good. I was thinking of maybe 4 background colors + grey, (Trying to use the existing resolution/status terms.) light grey: no resolution yet works for me? (can't reproduce?) Positive Progression points: light green works for me? (working patch/fix available?) accepted (patch accepted) fixed (patch applied) Don't close yet: light yellow later remind postponed pending out of date? (patch no longer works?) ready to close: light red duplicate won't fix rejected invalid With darker color vertical marks for status/resolution change points. > Furthermore, I remember that somewhere there was a discussion of these > values, and if we should keep all of them or not, but I can't find > that thread. Possibly Here ... http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-November/075160.html It was pointed out that these are hold-overs for SourceForge's bug tracker, and redesigning the work flow triage is something that needs to be done. It refers to ... http://wiki.python.org/moin/TrackerDocs/ > Thank you! You're Welcome! Ron ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/12/10, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is from the search page of the tracker. > > > don't care > > > accepted > > duplicate > fixed > invalid > later > out of date > postponed > > rejected > remind > wont fix > works for me > > > There are items in the tracker that have a resolutions set, but are still > open. So the resolution field is the process status field. I don't think > it needs to be mandatory. And the status field includes open/pending/close. Some "resolutions" imply that the issue is still open, and some imply that the issue should be closed. For example, I won't expect to see the issue still open if it's marked as "won't fix", "duplicate", "fixed", "invalid", "out of date", or "rejected". OTOH, it should be still open if the resolution is "later", or "remind". I'm not decided with "works for me". Anyway, as I only show the open issues, the resolution should be one of the later. Do you think that is useful the color to change if it is in "later" or "remind"? What's the benefit of this? Note that if we find open issues that are in the first group of resolutions, something should be corrected there. Furthermore, I remember that somewhere there was a discussion of these values, and if we should keep all of them or not, but I can't find that thread. Thank you! -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
Facundo Batista wrote: > 2007/12/8, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Looks much improved! :-) > > Thanks! > > >> Maybe components and keywords could be combined together and use check >> boxes so more than one item at a time can be selected? > > Regarding the combination, I don't think so: I'm just showing the info > from the Tracker differently, I don't want to change its concepts. > > Regarding the check-more-than-one: It could be done, but I don't know > if it actually will prove useful (it's always nice to be in more > control of the filters, but overcomplicating the searchs does not help > anybody, there's a point there in the middle, :) ). Ok, looking at it again, I agree. >> Ideally the temporal bar could be more like a mini gant/status chart which >> indicates the status as well as th activity. Maybe the background color >> can change when the status changes. > > For this the concept of "process" need to be added to the Tracker. > Today there's no such mandatory process for the issues. > > As I just show that info differently, I won't create an artificial process here. > > Thanks for your different proposals!! > > Regards, This is from the search page of the tracker. don't care accepted duplicate fixed invalid later out of date postponed rejected remind wont fix works for me There are items in the tracker that have a resolutions set, but are still open. So the resolution field is the process status field. I don't think it needs to be mandatory. And the status field includes open/pending/close. Do you have access to these and the times they are set? Cheers, Ron ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/12/8, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Looks much improved! :-) Thanks! > Maybe components and keywords could be combined together and use check > boxes so more than one item at a time can be selected? Regarding the combination, I don't think so: I'm just showing the info from the Tracker differently, I don't want to change its concepts. Regarding the check-more-than-one: It could be done, but I don't know if it actually will prove useful (it's always nice to be in more control of the filters, but overcomplicating the searchs does not help anybody, there's a point there in the middle, :) ). > Ideally the temporal bar could be more like a mini gant/status chart which > indicates the status as well as th activity. Maybe the background color > can change when the status changes. For this the concept of "process" need to be added to the Tracker. Today there's no such mandatory process for the issues. As I just show that info differently, I won't create an artificial process here. Thanks for your different proposals!! Regards, -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
Facundo Batista wrote: > 2007/11/1, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> I think the keyword and keywords interface can be improved. Do you have >>> any plans in that direction? >> Surely! >> >> But, no, I have no plans to do it, as I can not make cgi scripts in my >> hosting, so these pages are statics, generated every night, and that's >> all... > > Well, after my hosting allowing CGI, I now improved *a lot* the > interface of this page. Looks much improved! :-) > Now you have more columns: > > - Id > - Summary > - Priority > - Severity > - Components > - Versions > - Keywords > - Opened by (when) > - Temporal location > - Last update by (when) > > And, the biggest enhancement, you can filter by any combination of: > > - Priority > - Severity > - Component > - Version > - Keyword Maybe components and keywords could be combined together and use check boxes so more than one item at a time can be selected? The following suggestions will probably need changes to the data base. Maybe this be done at some point in the future. Ideally the temporal bar could be more like a mini gant/status chart which indicates the status as well as th activity. Maybe the background color can change when the status changes. The possible status sequences might be something like the following. Bugs... 1. bug > bug_confirmed > fix_provided > fix_accepted > fix_applied > closed 2. bug > invalid > closed Features... 3. feature > patch_provided > patch_accepted > patch_applied > closed 4. feature > patch_provided > rejected > closed 5. feature > rejected > closed Filtering on the above status keywords would give good results I think. The fix-provided and patch_provided status items might be split into tests, docs, and patch/fix provided. But that may not be needed. Cheers, Ron > As before, you have everything paged, and with a graph of activity per > day at the bottom. > > Enjoy it!: > > http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/facundo/py_tickets.html > > Regards, ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/11/1, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I think the keyword and keywords interface can be improved. Do you have > > any plans in that direction? > > Surely! > > But, no, I have no plans to do it, as I can not make cgi scripts in my > hosting, so these pages are statics, generated every night, and that's > all... Well, after my hosting allowing CGI, I now improved *a lot* the interface of this page. Now you have more columns: - Id - Summary - Priority - Severity - Components - Versions - Keywords - Opened by (when) - Temporal location - Last update by (when) And, the biggest enhancement, you can filter by any combination of: - Priority - Severity - Component - Version - Keyword As before, you have everything paged, and with a graph of activity per day at the bottom. Enjoy it!: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/facundo/py_tickets.html Regards, -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/10/25, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Clicking on one of the filter links changes the title back. (No Keyword, > Patch, P3K) Fixed, this was a bug, :( > I think the keyword and keywords interface can be improved. Do you have > any plans in that direction? Surely! But, no, I have no plans to do it, as I can not make cgi scripts in my hosting, so these pages are statics, generated every night, and that's all... > How do you get the data the page is built from? Parsing the results of http://bugs.python.org/ Regards, -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
Facundo Batista wrote: > 2007/10/24, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> Note that these items are *all* open. >> I think the page title should reflect this. Possible changing it from >> >> "Python tickets" >> >> to >> "Python Open Tickets" > > Good point! It's fixed now. > > Thank you! > Clicking on one of the filter links changes the title back. (No Keyword, Patch, P3K) I think the keyword and keywords interface can be improved. Do you have any plans in that direction? How do you get the data the page is built from? Cheers, Ron ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/10/24, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Note that these items are *all* open. > > I think the page title should reflect this. Possible changing it from > > "Python tickets" > > to > "Python Open Tickets" Good point! It's fixed now. Thank you! -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
Facundo Batista wrote: > 2007/9/19, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I noticed that there is a background of light blue between marks. That is >> hard to see on my computer because it is so close to the grey tone. > > Made it a little darker, now it's easier to look. > > >> Also shouldn't the light blue background bar extend all the way to the end >> for all open items? > > No, because this "light blue bar" is the span of time from opened to > last comment. > > Note that these items are *all* open. I think the page title should reflect this. Possible changing it from "Python tickets" to "Python Open Tickets" Ron ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/9/13, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > All the listings are accesible from the same pages, start here: > > http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/facundo/py_tickets.html > > (remember to refresh) > > Any idea to improve these pages is welcomed. Following an idea of John Lenton, now every page shows a graph of the activity per day of all open tickets. Look at the bottom: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/facundo/py_tickets.html Regards, -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/9/19, Ron Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I noticed that there is a background of light blue between marks. That is > hard to see on my computer because it is so close to the grey tone. Made it a little darker, now it's easier to look. > Also shouldn't the light blue background bar extend all the way to the end > for all open items? No, because this "light blue bar" is the span of time from opened to last comment. Note that these items are *all* open. Thanks for the feedback! Regards, -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
Facundo Batista wrote: > 2007/9/10, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I modified my tool, whichs makes a summary of all the Python tickets >> (I moved the source where the info is taken from SF to our Roundup). > > Based on an idea from Dennis Benzinger, now the temporal bars show the > moments where each comment was made, so it's easy to see the "rhythm" > of the ticket activity: > > http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/facundo/py_tickets.html Looks good. :-) I noticed that there is a background of light blue between marks. That is hard to see on my computer because it is so close to the grey tone. Also shouldn't the light blue background bar extend all the way to the end for all open items? Cheers, Ron ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/9/10, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I modified my tool, whichs makes a summary of all the Python tickets > (I moved the source where the info is taken from SF to our Roundup). Based on an idea from Dennis Benzinger, now the temporal bars show the moments where each comment was made, so it's easy to see the "rhythm" of the ticket activity: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/facundo/py_tickets.html Regards, -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python tickets summary
2007/9/10, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I modified my tool, whichs makes a summary of all the Python tickets > (I moved the source where the info is taken from SF to our Roundup). > > In result, the summary is now, again, updated daily: Taking an idea from Jeff Rush, now there're separate listings in function of the keyword of the ticket. This way, you can see only the Py3k tickets, or the patchs, etc. All the listings are accesible from the same pages, start here: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/facundo/py_tickets.html (remember to refresh) Any idea to improve these pages is welcomed. Regards, -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
