Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 14 October 2016 at 06:32, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Confirming, +1 from me. Barry, Nick? You two are the most active > authors of PEP 1. I've merged the PR that Barry wrote to address Mariatta's query, so I guess that counts as +1's from both of us :) Cheers, Nick. --

Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-13 Thread Terry Reedy
On 10/13/2016 5:59 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Oct 13, 2016, at 05:31 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: The major issue is making knowledge of rst and sphinx a requirement for submitting a PEP. I suggest making sure that PEP 1 exemplifies the preferred usage of rst in PEPs and then suggesting using it as

Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-13 Thread Eric Snow
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I don't understand the question: isn't the whole point of reST that it's a > easily readable markup language? Just post the reST! +1 -eric ___ Python-Dev mailing list

Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-13 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 13, 2016, at 05:31 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: >The major issue is making knowledge of rst and sphinx a requirement for >submitting a PEP. I suggest making sure that PEP 1 exemplifies the preferred >usage of rst in PEPs and then suggesting using it as model.

Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-13 Thread Terry Reedy
On 10/13/2016 4:38 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Oct 13, 2016, at 01:32 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Confirming, +1 from me. Barry, Nick? You two are the most active authors of PEP 1. +1 for text/x-rst being the preferred. We'd need some time to make it the default, but I'm generally in favor

Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-13 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 13, 2016, at 01:32 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Confirming, +1 from me. Barry, Nick? You two are the most active >authors of PEP 1. +1 for text/x-rst being the preferred. We'd need some time to make it the default, but I'm generally in favor of that happening. Is anybody actively

Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-13 Thread Guido van Rossum
Confirming, +1 from me. Barry, Nick? You two are the most active authors of PEP 1. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Mariatta Wijaya > wrote: >> PEP 1 states that plain/text is an acceptable

Re: [Python-Dev] Update to PEP 1 re: content type

2016-10-13 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote: > PEP 1 states that plain/text is an acceptable value for a PEP's content > type, and it is the default value if no content type is specified. > > May I propose adding something along the line of: "new PEPs should