Re: Modularity, container images, and the default Python stack(s)

2017-08-24 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 08/24/2017 12:22 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 24 August 2017 at 19:02, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 08/24/2017 10:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: My current thinking based on that discussion is that we're actually going to need a module set that looks like this for F28+: *

Re: Modularity, container images, and the default Python stack(s)

2017-08-24 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 24 August 2017 at 19:02, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 08/24/2017 10:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> My current thinking based on that discussion is that we're actually >> going to need a module set that looks like this for F28+: >> >> * Platform Python (already planned for F27)

Re: Modularity, container images, and the default Python stack(s)

2017-08-24 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 08/24/2017 10:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 21 August 2017 at 19:46, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 08/18/2017 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: Does that approach sound sufficiently plausible to folks that I can use it to provide feedback to the folks working on the modularity

Python 3.5.4 in Fedora 25

2017-08-24 Thread Petr Viktorin
Hello, Python 3.5.4 for Fedora 25 is now waiting in Bodhi; see more info here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/python3-3.5.4-1.fc25 Please test and provide karma :) -- Petr Viktorin ___ python-devel mailing list --

Re: Modularity, container images, and the default Python stack(s)

2017-08-24 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 21 August 2017 at 19:46, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 08/18/2017 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> Does that approach sound sufficiently plausible to folks that I can >> use it to provide feedback to the folks working on the modularity >> tooling as to the capabilities we