On 02/01/2018 04:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 1 February 2018 at 23:54, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Honestly, I'm not sure we want to use this in Fedora. Is anyone here into
reproducible builds, to make a better argument for this?
I believe rpmbuild (et al) all set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in the
environm
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 1 February 2018 at 23:54, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm not sure we want to use this in Fedora. Is anyone here into
>> reproducible builds, to make a better argument for this?
>
> I believe rpmbuild (et al) all set SOURCE_DATE_EPOC
On 1 February 2018 at 23:54, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Honestly, I'm not sure we want to use this in Fedora. Is anyone here into
> reproducible builds, to make a better argument for this?
I believe rpmbuild (et al) all set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in the
environment, so Fedora's likely to get the new CHECK
Hello!
The first beta for Python 3.7 is out. It will hopefully get into Fedora
soon as python37.
After it comes out of beta, we'll upgrade python3 to it.
The What's New list is at: https://docs.python.org/3.7/whatsnew/3.7.html
One thing that's interesting for packagers is PEP 552: Deterministi