> On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 06:06, Mattia Verga <mattia.verga(a)protonmail.com> > wrote: > > The extras macro expands to %package, %description, and %files; you > have put it in between a %package and %description, which will surely > confuse rpm somewhat. >
Oh, I've missed that. Thanks. > > You need to ensure that tox is installed as well, if it isn't listed > in upstream's requirements to get pulled in by > %pyproject_buildrequires. > I'll try adding the missing BuildReqs (I suppose `%pyproject_buildrequires -t` should be enough), then I'll have to have a look on how tox works... from a quick look to the tox config file, it seems that there are many environments specified, some of them are related to code linting. In the Guidelines I see these should be skipped, I'll need to find out how to do that. > > I asked a similar question earlier: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedorapr... > > But maybe you try removing the pin? Flask 2 did break things, but it > may not have broken your package. I don't know why upstream has pinned that requirement, the commit says it was for "fixing tests"... I'll try to ask upstream. Thank you _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
