Re: Version number of python-future

2023-01-17 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
-python3 = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 python-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11dist(future) = 0.18.3 python3dist(future) = 0.18.3 Have a nice day. Lumír On 1/13/23 21:52, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. Latest release of `future

Version number of python-future

2023-01-13 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Hi all. Latest release of `future`, the 0.18.3 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=32957279), is generating future = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 future-python3 = 0:0.18.3-2.fc38 python-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38 python3.11-future = 0.18.3-2.fc38

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

2021-06-08 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
On 6/8/21 3:58 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.10side tagto Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding.We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures.

Re: python-reportlab: undefined-non-weak-symbol

2020-06-30 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Thank you Jerry. On 30/06/20 22:22, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:45 AM Antonio T. sagitter > wrote: >> Are these `undefined-non-weak-symbol` expected in python-reportlab? >> >> https://pastebin.com/dRZUbpJx > > Yes, see this thread: >

python-reportlab: undefined-non-weak-symbol

2020-06-30 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Hi all. Are these `undefined-non-weak-symbol` expected in python-reportlab? https://pastebin.com/dRZUbpJx -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital